Earticle

현재 위치 Home

Review Article

우리나라와 캐나다 약사면허 국가시험제도 비교
Comparison of Pharmacist License Examination between Korea and Canada

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국임상약학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    한국임상약학회지 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제25권 제1호 (2015.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.1-8
  • 저자
    강민구
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A245012

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

4,000원

원문정보

초록

영어
A newly-structured Korean pharmacist license exam has been launched in 2015, reflecting upon the changes in the pharmacycurriculum from a 4 year program to a 6 year program in 2009. In order to provide new ideas to ensure that the new exam is oneof the most effective pharmacist evaluations that have taken place thus far, this study was done to compare the pharmacy examsin Korea and Canada. One of the major differences noted between the two countries' exams is that along with paper based MCQportion of the exam, Canada's exam also includes a performance-based section, known as OSCE, which the Korean PharmacyExam (KPE) does not have. Furthermore, with the MCQ portion of the exam, the Canadian exam asks about 300 questions, with 450minutes of test time allocated and taken during a period of two consecutive days, the KPE asks 350 questions, with 325 minutes oftest time allocated in one day. Although, similarly, many of the questions in both exams place emphasis on clinical or patient care,Canada's exam puts significantly more emphasis (50.5% of exam questions) on these types of questions than Korea (29.7% of examquestions). However, this percentage does not reflect the exact weight placed for the specific areas of knowledge it requires toanswer these questions, since the types of questions asked in this section in Canada could be placed in another section on theKPE. Canada's exam also has more questions (10% +150 questions for BC) on the topics of law and ethics compared to the KPE(5.7%). The reason for this may be that the Canadian society puts emphasis on the legal and ethical duties of pharmacists as aleader. However, since each country is unique in their social, economical, and cultural points of view, comparing the KPE to theCanadian licensing exam and applying these differences to the new KPE may not be appropriate. One last thing to consider is that,as WHO/FIP mentioned, in good pharmacy practice, continually updating and developing an appropriate pharmacy exam withconsideration of societal changes, is key to success in developing the scope of practice for current and future pharmacists.

목차

ABSTRACT
 연구 방법
 연구 결과
  우리나라 약사국시
  캐나다 약사국시
 고찰
 결론
 참고문헌

저자

  • 강민구 [ Minku Kang | 우석대학교 약학대학 ] Corresponding author

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국임상약학회 [Korean College of Clinical Pharmacy]
  • 설립연도
    1
  • 분야
    의약학>약학
  • 소개
    합리적 약물치료(rational pharmacotherapy)의 보장 및 증진을 궁극목적으로 하며 이를 달성하기 위해 임상약학의 발전과 회원 상호간의 친목을 도모한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    한국임상약학회지 [Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1226-6051
  • 수록기간
    1991~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 518 DDC 615

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국임상약학회지 제25권 제1호

    피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장