Welfare service user becomes a party for the contract when the administrative measure transfers to contract. This is, so to speak, to consider the welfare service user as a consumer. Such understanding, although it differs significantly to the original intent of previous measures, is now becoming a core form in welfare service usage. Even under the previous administrative measure structures, somewhat different service usage forms are being recognized. For example, self-supports for the homeless under the area of public assistance policy has become to gain the social interests. Under such approach, the service user gets social service from social service supplier and at the same time, it requires to become or forced to become self-supportive. This is a changed form of user type to the ‘ user who are required or forced to become self-supportive’. The consideration point at this stage is that in reality these various type of issues does not occur independently but such factors appear in a complex form within a single issue resolving. These realistic issues arising from the complex request of usage relation should be accepted from the users’ right and human right perspective. However accepting such complex request may comprise difficult issues that could not be overlooked. Naturally, each individual form of usage types often differ from fundamental policy principles. Also, even when it seems that the same principle is applied, the application method differ frequently. For example, in the case when the same principle of ‘self-supportive’ is becoming the issue, there is significant difference in meaning among ‘the consumer user’, ‘the service user who is being requested to become self-supportive’, and ‘the service user who need protection.’ Therefore, to resolve a reality cases with issues from the complex plural user form, the difference arising from the policy principles must also need to be considered. Moreover, the considerate point with the various user relation is that the traditional welfare state perspective regarding state, society and individual relation only does not explain what the diverse user relation confer with the rights and human right issues. This is to say that the right and human right structure under the traditional welfare model where the state only is the service provider does not explain the said problems arising from the diverse right and human right issues. For example, the trend of market orientation now requires the state with the roll of service provider, and the regulation controller to set the rule to control the service supply. Likewise, concerning the poverty arrangement issues, state roll does not satisfy only with the roll of being the subject of service provider regarding self-support, and right protector for the venerable group. Under the premise that the general right and human rights are ultimately related to the structure of individual, state and society, it is clear that such change largely impact the substance of human right and general rights.
복지서비스 이용자계약조치소비자공적 부조자립 자조를 요구받는 이용자인권서비스 제공자복지국가인권이론Welfare service usercontractadministrative measureconsumerpublic assistance policythe ‘user who are required or forced to become self-supportive’human rightself-supportivewelfare statehuman right theory
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.