Earticle

초록

영어

The Constitution Article 117, paragraph 1 and the Local Government Act No. 22 regulate that an local ordinance can be enacted within the scope of the statute. 'Within the scope of the statute' means 'within the scope of the non-violation of the statute'. This rule is applied to all authorities of local government as well as the authority of autonomy in local government legislation, including authority of autonomy in local government organization and personnel administration. The Local Government Act stipulates the authority of the local council and the local government head. A local ordinance must not violate the authority of the local council and the local government head decided in the Local Government Act. For example, although The Local Government Act assigns the authority of the nominating local public officials to the local government head, if an ordinance allowing the local council to nominate local public officials is enacted, that ordinance is violating the statute. By the way, in case an ordinance regulates that the local council cannot directly violate the authority of the local government head but can check the authority of the local government head, can we say the ordinance is illegal?As the Supreme Court' precedents, an ex post and passive restraints are permitted, but priory and positive restraints are not allowed. The purpose of this review is the questioning the validity of ' ex post and passive ' and the checking the individual Supreme Court cases from a critical viewpoint.

목차

Ⅰ. 序
 Ⅱ. 지방자치의 개념과 지방자치권의 근거
 Ⅲ. 지방자치의 헌법적 보장
 Ⅳ. 우리 지방자치단체의 조직형태와 지방의회 및 지방자치단체장의 권한
 Ⅴ. 지방의회와 지방자치단체장간의 권한범위에 관한 대법원 판례
 Ⅵ. 結
 참고문헌
 

키워드

자치규정 법률우위의 원칙 지방의회 지방자치단체장 지방자치법 ordinance the law predominance principle the local council the local government head the Local Government Act ex post and passive priory and positive

저자

• 심용재 [ Shim, Yong-Jae | 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 조교수, 변호사, 법학연구소연구위원. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물