The purpose of this study was to investigate the inconsistency of the judges in deciding taekwondo head point. This study defined the types of judges’ decision. Judges’ decision type 1 is when only one judge admitted the head point among the three judges. Judges’ decision type 2 is when the two judges admitted the head point among the three judges. Lastly, judges’ decision type 3 is when all the judges admitted the head point. This study was to confirm the consistency of judges’ decision through investigating the judges’ decision type 2 and judges’ decision type 3. In addition, by admitting the case of judges’ decision type 1 as a real ‘head point’, the study found out the changes in the game result. For this study, data on 7899 head point situation by referees's decision from 1441 games result(male : 1161 games, female:281 games) of the korea university taekwondo association's competition were used. By analyzing descriptive statistics, statistics through IBM SPSS 18.0 ver. The results presented that the consistency level of judges’ decision is very low(Judges’ decision type 3 showed 1 time(0.1%), judges’ decision type 2 showed 1776 times(22.5%), judges’ decision type 1 showed 6122 times(77.4%) out of 7899 times). and when the dmitting the case of judges’ decision type 1 as a real ‘head point’, 169 games(11.7%) are changed by out of 1442 games.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 1. 연구의 필요성 Ⅱ. 연구방법 1. 연구대상 2. 연구자료 3. 연구변인의 정의 4. 자료처리 Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의 1. 심판 간 머리 득점판정의 일치수준 2 심판 간 판정 불일치가 승․패에 미치는 영향 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
현대사회에 있어서 신체활동 연구의 주요 탐구과제는 ‘신체활동을 통한 교육’으로부터 ‘인간의 기본적인 움직임’을 목표로 하는 스포츠적인 움직임을 중심으로 한 생명 활동의 개념으로 급속히 변화되고 있는 추세이다. 이러한 환경변화에 대응하기 위하여 본학회는 ‘체육’적인 요소에서 ‘스포츠’적인 요소를 중심으로 한 학문적 정체성을 견고히 하고, 정기적인 학술지 발간과 학술활동을 통해 한국스포츠츠 문화의 발전과 학문적인 발전에 기여하는데 그 목적이 있다.