Many regulations to protect workers’ claims of wage are said to be established in terms of social policy to guarantee construction workers’ minimum standards of living, based on that Korea’s construction sites are composed layered and layered. But in spite of many kinds of institutional strategy, workers’ claims of wage are very much often not protected due to absence or insufficiency of regulation so that systematic complement is essential now. The most controversial issue in construction sites’ structure of employment is whether personal separate contractor called ‘Oyaji’ is worker or not. Oyaji is not a construction business operator on Construction Business Act so that he cannot participate as a subcontractor. In addition, he is not likely to be seen as a business owner because he just provides labor with a few workers. Actually, many evils such as delay in payment of wages and so on are attending Oyaji. Nevertheless, approving Oyaji as a business owner can incapacitate the applicable rules by admitting illegal subcontractors, which results in turning away from protecting workers. So it is essential to make it clear on the law that who is not a construction business operator on Construction Business Act cannot be a business owner. And it is proper that in case Oyaji employs and instructs workers within his own responsibility and takes profit of remaining at which workers’ wage is deducted, Oyaji is regarded as a user(who works for a owner) and given a double status as a worker and a user. If things come to this stage, a legal business owner on Construction Business Act is given a user’s status which makes him a wage payment obligator so that harmful consequences are corrected. In addition, problems about regulating joint liability on wage payment questions about construction workers’ eligibility to receive substitute payment and can be solved too so that workers can be protected effectively. About prohibition of seizure on cost of construction- the equivalent of wages-, it should be made clear that even though cost of construction is completely seized, workers’ wage cannot be seized. And it should be the same case as upper constructor or launcher’s subcontract cost. To sum up, workers’ claim of wage is often not protected in spite of many regulations for worker protection. So, to protect their claims of wage which is the main source of living, the regulations should be supplemented to protect them effectively in consideration of social policy.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며 Ⅱ. 건설도급의 구조 및 체불임금 현황 Ⅲ. 도급사업에 있어서의 임금채권보호제도 Ⅳ. 몇 가지 검토해야 할 문제와 개선방안 Ⅴ. 맺는 말 참고문헌 Abstract
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.