This article attempts to understand the meaning of the “Two Swords” idea of the Middle Ages, and its course of transition and integration into the modern political concept. The letter Duo Sunt which was sent to the Byzantine emperor Anasthasius I (491-518) by Pope Gelasius I (492-496) and the Two Swords doctrine which was conceived by the medieval canonists and theologians served to establish the legal authority of the Church over its conflict with sacerdotal and secular powers in the Middle Ages. From the perspective of the Roman Church, the Two Swords represented the sovereignty of the Church over spiritual and secular powers and viewed this order to be completely consistent with the papal Plenitudo Potestatis. As with Saint Augustine’s interpretation of natural law, this hierarchy of power sustained that governments and laws derive their authority from God and all the rulers, therefore were subjects of the supreme Ruler. In the late thirteenth century, the medieval understanding and notion of the “Two Swords” or the “two powers” radically transformed under the influence of Aristotelian philosophy. Thomas Aquinas advocated the existence of a natural harmony between faith and reason through his efforts in uniting the Aristotelian philosophy with the principles of Christian theology – which subsequently lead to the emergence of radical and progressive intellectuals. John of Paris asserted the papal authority only to the spiritual jurisdiction, while insisting that powers on all secular affairs remained with secular rulers. This view greatly emasculated the medieval tradition and the idea of Two Swords that identified spiritual and secular powers with the Pope. Marsilius of Padua who was under the strong influence of Aristotle’s works denied the papal political sovereignty and his coercive jurisdiction. Moreover he held that general council which was consist of people was infallible, but not the Pope and consequently supported “popular sovereignty” – that spiritual powers were to be exercised by a general council. Through the works of these progressive political philosophers the idea of Two Swords evolved from its medieval roots to the shape of modern political conception.
목차
I. 머리말 II. 두 권력론과 두 검 이론의 가교 III. 아리스토텔레스의 영향과 두 검 이론의 변형 VI. 두 검 이론의 근대적 형상화 V. 맺는말 <참고문헌>
키워드
두권력론두 검 이론교황의 완전권영적 권력세속권력Duo sunttwo swordsplenitudo potestatisspiritual powertemporal power
본 학회는 "역사학의 발전과 민족문화의 창달에 이바지한다"는 목표하에 도내의 역사학자들을 주축으로 1976년에 창립된 이래 30년 이상의 연륜을 이어온 정통 역사학회이다. 수차례의 학술대회를 개최하였을 뿐 아니라, 학술지 '전북사학'을 30호까지 발간하면서 지역 사학 발전의 토대를 놓았다는 평가를 받고 있다. 본 학회는 현재 약 240여명의 회원을 두고 있으며, 격월로 임원회의와 월례발표회를 개최하고 있다. 매 발표회에 실제로 참여하는 인원이 항상 30명이 넘는다. 대부분의 역사관련 학회가 주로 대학교수나 강사들로 구성되어 있는 데 비해 전북사학회는 대학교수, 강사는 물론 학예사, 연구원, 중등학교 역사담당교사 등 역사와 관련된 다양한 구성원들로 이루어져 있다는 장점을 지니고 있다. 대학에서 연구한 역사학에 관한 이론을 중등학교 교육 현장에 올바로 적용하여 이론과 실제를 하나로 만들려는 것이 향후 전북사학회의 지향점이다.
간행물
간행물명
전북사학 [JEONBUK SAHAK ; The Jeonbuk Historical Journal]