Earticle

초록

영어

The Medical Affairs Law regulates that Medical Doctor and Korean Medical Doctor(KMD) can practice in the boundary of each licence. But there is no clear provision to explain what practice in the boundary of MD’s permitted region and what is KMD’s. Moreover practice over the boundary of licence could be punished as a violation of the Law. KMD’s use of medical devices have been objects of legal conflicts in the field. Because there is no clear provision in the Law, judical precedents have played the role as practical and final regulations. In this study, analyses on some judical precedents could show some rationales whether an issued KMD's use of medical devices is in the boundary of license. The courts considered the theories based on the practice, the level of required specialty and education, and the probability of danger to a patient. The judical precedents should be reviewed more precisely in the respects that it is adaptable in “the written law system”and it is desirable to divide boundaries between MD’s and KMD’s.

목차

I. 서
 II. 의료법 관련규정 및 쟁점
  1. 의료법 관련규정 및 유권해석
  2. 법률적 쟁점
 III. 판례의 판단기준
  1. 주요 의료기기별 판례 개관
  2. 판단기준
  3. 평가 및 고찰
 IV. 구분의 명확성에 대한 판례의 태도
  1. ‘면허된 의료행위’ 구분의 명확성
  2. 처벌관련 신중한 태도
  3. 평가 및 고찰
 V. 요약 및 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 곽숙영 [ Kwak Sook Young | 보건복지부 일반직고위공무원, 현 한의약정책관, 보건학박사. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  의료법학 [THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF LAW AND MEDICINE]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-8069

• 수록기간

  2000~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 517 DDC 613