The focus of this paper is the criminal assessment of religiously moti vated circumcision in Germany. A circumcision could be justified based u pon an effective consent given by the person concerned. In the case of a religious circumcision on a boy without a medical indication however, t his consent by the person concerned could not be justified according a t o judgement of district court Köln(LG Köln). Therefore surgeon or urolog ist who performs the circumcision is punishable according to the German Criminal Code. Thereafter a new Act justifying the circumcision is legislat ed. The current german legal status may help us to solve a similar case.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말 Ⅱ. 독일 형사법원 판례 Ⅲ. 남성 아동의 포경수술에 있어서 친권의 범위에 관한 법률 Ⅳ. 우리에게 주는 시사점 Ⅴ. 맺음말 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
키워드
포경수술(환상절제술)피해자 승낙아동의 복리치료행위사회적 상당성정당화사유금지착오종교의 자유circumcision(zikumzision Beschneidung)consent(Einwilligung)child’s well-being(Kindeswohl)act of medical treatmentadequancy in a social sense(Sozialadäquanz)justificatory defencemistake of law(Verbotsirrtum)religious freedom
저자
박희영 [ Park, Hee-Young | 독일 막스플랑크 국제형법연구소 연구원, 법학박사. ]