Earticle

초록

영어

This paper is about the judgment of determining the need formodification of an indictment theories and the criteria for the judgment ofdetermining the need for modification for studied. Truth discovery and substantive modification of an indictment theauthority to impose penalties the country, and at the same time to enableproper exercise of the accused can guarantee defense of the rightsinstitution. Thus, the court can modification of modification of reason modificationof an indictment occurs, the public prosecutor require. The public prosecutormust apply for modification of an indictment. An indictment should be changed in any case for the opposition to havea different theory. Most importantly, the public prosecutor receive anindictment want to judge described the defendant appeals the fact itself. In this sense, the theory is reasonable to mention the fact. SupremeCourt follows this theory. In fact, according to the change of these claims,and the fact that the defendant's defense of the changes result in asubstantial penalty if the concern is that should the need modification of anindictment.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 공소장변경의 필요성판단에 관한 학설
 Ⅲ. 공소장변경의 필요성판단에 관한 판례
 Ⅳ. 맺는 말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 이존걸 [ Lee, John-Girl | 전주대학교 사회과학대학 법학과 교수, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340