For the past 6 years, repeated research was conducted to develop the NFS method which was to improve the current examination method to meet the needs in the domestic situations. This study analyzes validity and accuracy of the NFS method through carefully controlled experiments. Also, in order to compare the accuracy between the Utah technique - so far, it is the most popular technique used in domestic situationsand the newly developed NFS technique, same experimental conditions were applied. The lie group’s task was to do a virtual criminal act and then asked to lie about their virtual crime and the truth group’s task was to do a normal desk work. Once the participants were finished with their task, the polygraph examinations each employed the NFS technique and the Utah technique separately was administered. The NFS technique showed 90% sensitivity, 100% specificity with 94.4% accuracy among 18 people tested. 2 people out of 20 had to be dropped off due to indiscernibleness. And for the Utah technique, it showed 83.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity with 94.1% accuracy. Both techniques showed high levels of accuracy. Further implications and limitations regarding these techniques will be dealt on the discussion section.
목차
Abstract I. 서론 II. 연구 방법 1. 연구 참여자 2. 측정장비 3. 분석 방법 4. 실험설계 5. 자료 분석 III. 결과 1. NFS 기법의 판별 기준 구간 설정 2. Utah 기법의 판별 기준 구간 설정 3. 검사 기법 별 거짓말에 대한 PDD검사 검사의 변별확률에 대한 차이검증 IV. 논의 V. 참고문헌
법과학 분야는 사회정의 구현에 있어 크나큰 가치가 있음에도 불구하고 우리나라에서는 이 분야에 대한 인식이 미흡하여 선진 외국에 비해 침체되어 있는 실정이다. 이에 우리나라에서도 법과학 분야와 관련 있는 학계, 연구기관, 수사기관 등 유관 단체들로 구성된 한국 법과학회를 창립하여 이 분야를 활성화 시켜 과학수사를 한층 더 발전시키기 위함을 목적으로 한다.