Earticle

초록

영어

If Game Rating Board tries to interpret the paragraph 4 of Article 22 of Act on the Promotion of the GameIndustry as the meaning that it can revoke it’s rating of a game when the rated game falls under the category ofrating rejection owing to Ordinance’s revision after the rating, the interpretation could violate constitutionalismand protection of trust. According to the paragraph 2 and 4 of Article 22 of The Act, The Board may reject a rating application filedby an entity that has requested a rating without legitimate authority or that is using other illegal methods andshall, without delay, revoke its rating when it determines or discovers that a rated game falls under the categoryof rating rejection. Administrative court ruled that the interpretation of a law regarding revocation of a beneficialadministrative disposition should be limited in the original meaning of the law; it is desirable that the Board’s theInterpretation Criteria of Ordinance relating to the revocation of a game rating could be reconsidered in theviewpoint of constitutionalism and protection of trust.

목차

ABSTRACT
 1. 서론
 2. 게임물 등급분류 제도와 사행성게임물의 등급분류 거부
  2.1 게임물 등급분류 제도와 등급분류의 거부
  2.2 사행성게임물에 대한 등급분류의 거부
 3. 사행성게임물이 아닌 것에 대한 등급분류 거부
  3.1 기타 실체적 이유에 근거한 등급분류 거부
  3.2 절차적 이유에 근거한 등급분류 거부
  3.3 소결 : 입법론상 재고가 필요한 지점
 4. 등급분류 거부 제도와 등급분류 결정의 취소
  4.1 등급분류 결정 취소
  4.2 실체적하자를 이유로 한 취소
  4.3 절차적하자를 이유로 한 취소
 5. 결론 : 수익적행정행위의 취소와 그 한계
 감사의 글
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 문기탁 [ Ki Tak Mun | 성신여자대학교 법과대학 교수 ] Correspondence to

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  컴퓨터게임및콘텐츠논문지(구 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지) [Journal of Computer Games and Contents]

• 간기

  월간

• pISSN

  3091-7409

• eISSN

  3092-3638

• 수록기간

  2002~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 691 DDC 793