Earticle

현재 위치 Home

硏究論文

지적장애인에 대한 성년후견제도의 문제점
Problems of Guardianship for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국비교노동법학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    노동법논총 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제30집 (2014.04)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.183-228
  • 저자
    조성혜
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A218329

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

9,400원

원문정보

초록

영어
When a person turns 19 years old, he or she is legally emancipated. An adult is presumed competent to make decisions in all areas of his life. This means that parents are no longer able to make decision on behalf of their children. People with intellectual disabilities have also the right to lead full and satisfying lives as others do. As adults, some people with intellectual disabilities are able to lead independent lives in the community without support. But some people have serious, lifelong limitation in functioning. Although they are considered a competent adult with legal rights to individual self-determination, they may not be able to rationally make the decisions required in life, such as where to live or what to spend money. If a person is unable to make daily decisions and lead a normal life, a parent or other person should help them as a guardian. On 1. July, 2013 Adult Guardianship is introduced in Korean Civil Code in order to care for the personal and property interests of an another person(ward) who is incapable of caring for his or her own interests due to mental illness, mental deficiency or intellectual disability. The individual seeking guardianship must file a petition for guardianship of the alleged person with disabilities(respondent). Guardians are appointed by the family court to represent the interests of disabled persons. Legal Guardianship is a formal, legal process in which a family court requested to assume responsibility for a person as a “ward” and then may appoint an “agent” to act as guardian. If an intellectually disabled person is deemed to be unable to make decisions and lead an independent life, an adult guardian may be appointed to handle the person’s affairs. The court may grant “limited guardianship” allowing the guardian to make only certain decisions. And “special guardianship” is created for the limited purpose of helping the incapacitated person with protective arrangements. There is another form of guardianship which is established by guardianship contract(voluntary guardianship) between the ward and agent for the present or probable future incapacity of the ward. Guardianship is a valuable tool which can be used to protect individuals who has not ability to make appropriate personal or financial decisions for themselves. However, there is much to be solved as follows:The guardianship contract is not appropriate for the people with intellectual disabilities insofar as the contract is only concluded by the person in question. The person with intellectual disabilities cannot decide by himself whether he needs any guardian or not. Further there is no provisions in Civil Code whether a parent can designate a successor guardian through will, or what if there is no one else who can serve as a successor guardian. Because establishing a guardianship may remove considerable rights from an individual, it should only be considered after alternatives to guardianship to have proven ineffective or are unavailable. If an individual has a disability, yet still maintains the capacity to make decisions in all areas of their life, guardianship is not necessary. A guardianship is a legal arrangement because other alternatives are inadequate to meet a person’s health and safety needs. So the best option is the “least restrictive” guardianship to support and promote the person’s decision-making skills and rights.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 지적장애인의 개념과 성년후견인의 필요성 여부
 Ⅲ. UN의 지적장애인권리선언과 장애인권리협약에 비추어 본 성년후견인
 Ⅳ. 지적장애인에 대한 성년후견인제도의 문제점
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 <Abstract>

키워드

지적장애 성년후견 발달장애 자폐성장애 후견계약 Intellectual Disability Adult Guardianship Developmental Disability Autism Spectrum Disorders Guardianship Contract

저자

  • 조성혜 [ Cho, Sung-Hae | 동국대학교 법과대학-서울 교수 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
  • 설립연도
    1997
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다. 학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    노동법논총 [The Journal of Labor Law]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1229-4314
  • 수록기간
    1998~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 336 DDC 363

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 노동법논총 제30집

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장