Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

노인장기요양보험제도의 개선과제
A Study on Improvement Proposal of Long-Term Care Insurance for the Aged

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국사회법학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    사회법연구 바로가기
  • 통권
    제18호ㆍ19호 (2012.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.125-180
  • 저자
    백효영
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A215513

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

10,900원

원문정보

초록

영어
Korea is in the rapid aging process and has increasing number of households of elderly singles and couples due to increase in number of nuclear family. Since the social environment of women has changed, economically active female population has increased, and caregiver for the elderly population has decreased. Accordingly, thoughts that protection of traditional family and the caregiver has reached its limits arose, and in July 2008, “Long Term Care Insurance for The Elderly” was enacted to emphasize social responsibility for the elderly problems as a new system. Enactment of this Act was expected to improve the quality of life of the people by stabilizing the elderly life and reducing the burden of their families. However, the current long term care insurance for the elderly has not retrieved much success, after five years of its enactment. In this paper, the following improvements were suggested. First, the limited range of subjects aged 65 or over or under 65 with elderly specific disease such as dementia or cerebrovascular disease was considered to be expanded step-by-step, and whether to concentrate on serious cases or to provide service to large number of patients with mild symptoms must be considered as well. Second, expansion of the current long-term care benefits and payments that are limited to home salary, facility reimbursement, and special cash benefits method is suggested. Instead of having set reimbursement for each grade, having set payment considering degree of disability within each grade and a method such as the preventive benefit plans Furthermore, improvements of inequity between users of long term care facilities that are regulated by the Long Term Care Hospital care fee regulations and those who do not due to problems in inequity by paying fees equally or similarly. Also, care provider in family relationships were not being treated fair financially, so the need of improvement was called. Third, the need of mitigation of validate period for the operation and the use of long term care insurance for the elderly, which is too short for those who has the care grade of 1, strengthen the authority of National Health Insurance Corporation to resolve problems caused by absence of power to designate, cancel, question, and inspect, and the need of permissions to create the long term care institutions to prevent installation of institutions that cannot guarantee the quality, which has been a problem since many facilities were built carelessly to initiate the enactment, have been suggested. Additionally, providing more specific information about long term care institution since the care receivers do not have enough information for institution selection, and securing expertise on visiting investigators from grade decision committee to ensure reliability and objectivity of them since their lack of expertise have brought their reliability into question have been pointed out. And provision which requires either one of physician or doctor to rule the grade may needs to be stricter as needed. Also, certain legal basis are needed to be set for the care service in order to improve treatment of care workers, secure expertise of care workers, and regulate the quality of service of care facilities. On the other hand, reviewing introduction of independent evaluation task force might be necessary since the evaluation of long term care facilities is exclusively entrusted on National Health Insurance Corporation, calling problems due to excessive control. Increasing quality of care workers instead of quantity should be in priority, along with strict and specific standards on their curriculum. Forth, most of elders who does not have financial support will hesitate to use the long term care insurance if the burden is high. Thus, individual deductibles. Long Term Care Insurance for the Elderly has performed its role for four years in the Republic of Korea, and might not be right time to evaluate and judge the system yet. However, continual improvement and fixation to problems occurred thus far will certainly accelerate settlement of the long term care insurance for the elderly.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 노인장기요양보험제도의 이론적 고찰
 Ⅲ. 노인장기요양보험의 주요내용
 Ⅳ. 현행법의 개선방안
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

저자

  • 백효영 [ Hyo-Young Paek | 동국대학교 법과대학 강사 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국사회법학회 [The Korean Association of Social Security Law]
  • 설립연도
    2003
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    인간다운 생활의 보장」은 이제 개인만의 문제가 아니며, 현대 모든 복지국가의 중요한 과제입니다. 우리나라도 국민의 복지향상을 위하여 건강보험·연금보험·산업 재해보상보험·고용보험등 사회보험분야에 사회보험법을, 또 국가유공자·공익행위자의 사회적 보상을 위하여 사회보상법을 제정·시행하고 있으며, 영세민의 기초생활보장과 장애인·노인·아동·여성등의 복지향상을 위하여 사회부조법·사회복지법 내지 사회복지서비스법을 제정·시행하고 있습니다. 그러나 우리나라의 사회법관련제도는 단기간의 외형적 급성장에도 불구하고, 그 역사가 비교적 짧으며, 아직도 초창기에 있습니다. 그 결과 무수한 법개정과 시행착오를 경험하지 않으면 아니되었으며, 현재에도 많은 문제점을 내포하고 있습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 이 분야 법제도의 학문적·체계적 연구는 아직도 미흡한 실정입니다. 제도는 법을 통하여 생성·변경·소멸됩니다. 사회보험제도, 사회보상제도 및 사회복지제도도 예외가 아닙니다. 이러한 제도의 발달도 그 제도의 기초가 되는 사회법의 심도깊은 연구를 통하여 성취될 수 있습니다. 더구나 이 제도들은 복합적이고, 서로 연관되어 있는 경우가 허다하므로, 여러 전문가와 실무자의 통합적 접근이 필요합니다. 이에 이 분야의 전문지식과 실무경험을 가진 뜻있는 사람들이 모여 사회법과 사회법관련제도를 학문적·체계적으로 집중 연구하고자 합니다. 그로써 우리나라가 지향하고 있는 복지국가에의 길을 좀 더 단축시키는데 기여하고자 합니다. 역사는 단축시킬 수는 있어도 뛰어 넘을 수는 없기 때문입니다. 우리와 뜻을 같이 하시는 많은 분들의 참여를 바랍니다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    사회법연구 [Studies of Social Security Law]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1738-1118
  • 수록기간
    2003~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 사회법연구 제18호ㆍ19호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장