Earticle

초록

영어

Jackendoff (1989) contains an analysis of the meaning of the verb climb in terms of preference rules. In such an analysis, we can define a given use of a word as more ‘prototypical’ if more of the “preference rules” are satisfied in the situation in which the word is used. In his two frame semantics articles, Fillmore (1982, 1985) suggests another analysis of ‘prototype effects’ of the kind Rosch (1981) studies. The question in part of this paper is, what would be the analysis of climb in a frame semantics approach? How does it account for the relative prototypicality of the uses of the word climb?
It has frequently been discussed (e.g., Austin 1964) that a word like imitation does not semantically modify a noun in the standard ‘set intersection’ way. For example, something correctly described as imitation coffee looks and tastes like coffee; but, whatever it is, it is not made of coffee beans. (Fillmore 1982: 133) The second half of this paper will discuss the so-called syncategorematic terms like imitation, which do not work like other noun modifiers.

목차

I. Introduction
 II. Fillmore's(1982, 1985) analysis of some words
  2.1 land vs. ground
  2.2. shore vs. coast
  2.3 outwest vs. backeast
  2.4 The meaning of vegetarian
  2.5 The meaning of orphan
 III. Analysis of climb
  3.1 Analysis of some example sentences
  3.2 Further analysis of climb
  3.3 Some more remarks
 IV. Syncategoremaitc modifiers
  4.1 Synthetic, artificial, and counterfeit
  4.2 Fake and imitation
  4.3 Positivew(authentic, genuine, real, true)
 V. Conclusion

키워드

저자

• Hee-Chul Lee [ Chonbuk National University ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  영어영문학연구 [Studies on English Language & Literature]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1226-8682

• 수록기간

  1972~2020

• 십진분류

  KDC 840 DDC 820