Earticle

초록

영어

For the last few decades the method of computational phylogenetic analysis has been successfully adopted in numerous cases of text-critical works. It has opened a new possibility of textual criticism based on the possibility of dealing with a number on taxa with long lists of characters. But it seems that the method introduced to the field not only new technical possibilities but also a new perspective of textual stemmatics. To make this point clear an attempt is made in the present article to differentiate clearly the phylogenetic analysis (in Hennigian sense) from the computational cladistics. The major point is that the former method accepts the presupposed evolutionary process not only in the formal sense but also in the historical one. Overall, the different methodological possibilities offered by the computational phologenetic analysis and cladistics have, in my view, their own advantages depending on the general situation of the textual transmission of the target texts. Furthermore, indifferentiated application of the traditional philological method would not be valid, if it is adopted without any reference to a concrete history of text transmission(s). I have additionally attempted to make some suggestions for the future text-critical works with regard to the orally transmitted literature of Korea.

목차

I. 들어가는 말
 II. 형태론적 분석과 분자단위 분석 그리고 텍스트 분석에의 적용
 III. 분석의 기술적 실행가능성 문제
 IV. 시간축이 제거된 문헌계통도
 V. 문헌학의 전통적 방법론 논의
 VI 전통 문헌학의 계통분석방법 실행
 VII 분기학(cladistics)과 계통발생학(phylogenetics)
 VIII 계통발생분석(phylogenetical analysis)의 전제와 한계
 IX 텍스트 전승의 핵심 문제들: 모양닮음(homoplasy)과 혼용(contamination)
 X 응용 전망과 한국 고전에의 적용 가능성
 인용문헌
 [Abstract]

키워드

저자

• 강성용 [ Sung Yong Kang | 서울대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  인문언어 [LINGUA HUMANITATIS]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  1598-2130

• 수록기간

  2000~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 705 DDC 405