Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

자동차보험진료수가 심사위탁에 관한 소고 - 자배법 제12조의 2를 중심으로 -
A Study on Medical Charge Assessment Contract for Auto Insurance - Focused on Clause 2, Article 12, Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act -

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제29집 제2호 (2013.06)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.7-30
  • 저자
    정정일
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A202783

원문정보

초록

영어
The National Assembly of Korea established the Clause 2(Assessment Contract), Article 12, by revising the Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act in part on Nov. 29, 2011. The purpose of the new Clause 2, Article 12 of Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act was “to prevent leakage of insurance benefits and improve the medical service quality by strengthening specialty, objectivity and fairness of the medical charge assessment for auto insurance through the medical charge assessment contract with the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the professional assessment institution, because of serious leakage of insurance money by false and excessive medical examination and insurance fraud.” The legal status of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in accordance with Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act is the contractor for medical charge assessment with the insurers. In other words, when an insured causes a car accident and a medical institution requests the medical charge after taking care of that insured, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service assesses if the medical treatment is appropriate for treatment details, determines the medical charge and notifies it to the medical institution. The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service is the contractor of insurers which does the businesses related to assessment and claims executed by the insurers in the past. The system which an objection against medical charges determined by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the assessment contractor, is made and the final means is the legal action in a court when such objection is not accepted is very unfair treatment for medical institutions in terms of fairness and equity. Accordingly, the insurers shall prevent any objections against the assessment results by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, their contractors for assessment to which they pay the fees. If it is considered that the assessment results by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service is unfair, it is required to revise the provisions of Article 19 (Assessment Request on Medical Charge of Auto Insurance and Others), Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act, to enable the medical institutions to request the assessment to Auto Insurance Council for the equity between insurers and medical institutions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 우리나라의 자동차보험진료수가제도 쟁점
 Ⅲ. 자동차손해배상보장법 제12조의2 시행에 따른 문제점 검토
 Ⅳ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자

  • 정정일 [ Jeong, Jeong-Ile | 경기대학교 법학과 대우교수, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제29집 제2호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장