This Pater aims to reveal the character of the modern ‘border politics’ in Northeast asia(“the East Sea Rim Region”) by analyzing interaction between the notion of ‘the Other’ and the national narratives in the late 1980's and 1900's. The intellectuals of the northeast who understood themselves as pioneers of civilization produced the image of Wildness and primitive peoples contrast to modernity and modern peoples(the nation) to write travel works of the borderlands of northeast asia. The image of primitivity also was coincident with old common sense of the orient that the western had regarded the eastern civilization as inferior. The northeast intellectuals travelled the borderlands of their countries as Russian and Japanese was interested in propagation of primitive images. Therefore to write essays about the eastern primitive life, they selected primitive features, strengthened their orientalism or colonization and started analyzing them as the others of the civilization. But Korean intellectuals travelled the northeastern borderlands seemed to be based on the idea that they ware the pioneer and the subjugated class, so they were feeling not to unify their historical imagination and the colonized reality. On the other hand, Chinese writers described their primitivity as Chinese roots. The cultural representations of borderlands had been articulated with the national narratives. the discourse of borderlands reveals the inconsistency of the national narratives.
목차
Ⅰ. ‘원시적 타자’에 대한 물음 Ⅱ. 근대 국민서사와 변방의 지정성(地政性) Ⅲ. 환동해 변방을 통해 본 주권의 경계와 표상체계 1. ‘원시’의 발견과 시각적 헤게모니 2. 인종학적 생명권력과 식민지 페다고지 3. ‘예외상태’로서의 변방, 변방민(民) Ⅳ. 변방의 역설 참고문헌 논문초록
키워드
변방원시적 타자국민서사생명권력예외상태Borderlandsthe Primitive Othersthe National NarrativesBio-PowerExceptional State
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.