At first, we can find the network of private merchants on trade with China from nominal relations. By relations between government official, such as Uiju-bu(義州府), byeljang(別將), Yeokgwan(譯官), the merchants followed envoys from paying money, or replacing other name in the document(渡江文書). Also they used systems of Yeoma(餘馬) and Yeonbok(延卜), or participated in trade of Dalyeonsa(團練使) with paying a commission. Moreover, at the relationship between Chinese, they gave convenience to the private merchants by the Chinese government official whose ancestor was Joseon-man or people who participated in envoys are cousin with Chinese. Furthermore, connection between the Joseon private merchants, who had the financial strength, and Chinese merchants traded extensively, and the relation of Nandu (欄頭) is representative of it. The network appeared since the policy of disregarding commerce, the absurdity of national finance & collecting taxes, and lack of local government office's charge were emerged. Eventually, clashes about management policy of trade broke out between Yeokgwan versus private merchants and central government versus local governments. The government had announced policies which are various enforcement regulations(節目), installation and removal of Chaengmun-Trade(柵門後市). Then the policies of the government experienced many dispute and errors to be perfect. Through this process, trade that Yeokgwan major could change to the private merchant major. It resulted from the merchant's capital, distribution network, and human relationship.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 사상들의 대청무역 연결망 사례 Ⅲ. 무역환경 변화에 따른 정부의 딜레마 해결 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌 <부표> 논문초록
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.