Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study is to look at the type and characteristics of the crisis discourse which have been discussed through the newspapers and magazines during Japanese Colonization of Korean Peninsular, through a representative philosophers who are Kim Du-Heon, Jeon Won-Bae, Park Jong-Hong, Park Chi-Woo, Kim, Gi-Seok. I examined that how Korean philosophers had perceived the ‘crisis’ in the realities and how they had resoponded to it which they face at the time of the Japanese Colonization of Korean Peninsular. In addition, reviewing the problems of the Korean philosophers ‘philosophy and reality’ and ‘philosophy and crisis’, I examined the crisis discourse which they present whether philosophical background came about. Through the crisis discourse, they want to explore the contradictions of the era, namely the solution to exit the crisis through, for philosophical. Although showing the awareness of crisis and the responses in different positions, it was a common appearance to these philosophers that grasping contradictory reality of the crisis philosophically, and searching for the solutions through serious philosophical reflection. However as a acceptance time Western Philosophy, It can be pointed out as a problem that our reality applied to solve the problem of crisis through several western philosophical thinking.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 철학자별 위기담론의 유형과 성격
  1. 김두헌의 위기론
  2. 전원배의 위기론
  3. 박종홍의 위기론
  4. 박치우의 위기론
  5. 김기석의 위기론
 Ⅲ. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 논문초록

키워드

저자

• 이태우 [ Lee, Tae-Woo | 영남대학교 철학과 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  동북아 문화연구 [Journal of North-east Asian Cultures]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-3692

• 수록기간

  2001~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 910 DDC 950