Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study is to introduce the limit of previously used six sigma quality process evaluation metrics, and , and a solution to overcome this drawback by using a metric based on performance evaluation of Z-factor quality innovation. Case analysis on projects from national six sigma contest from 2011 to 2012 is performed and literature review on new drug development HTS (High Throughput Screening) is used to propose innovative performance evaluation metrics. This research shows that experimental study on six sigma evaluation metric, and , have no significance difference between industrial type (Manufacturing, Semi-Public Institute, Public Institute) and CTQ type (Product Technology Type CTQ, Process Technology Type CTQ). Following discovery characterize this quality improvement as fixed target type project. As newly developed moving target type of quality innovation performance metric Z-Factor is used for evaluating experimental study, hypothetical analysis suggests that and share different relationship or even show reciprocal relationship. Constraints of the study are relatively small sample size of only 37 projects from past 2 years and conflict on having interview and communication with six sigma quality practitioner for qualitative experimental study. Both moving target type six sigma innovation project and fixed target type improvement project or quality circle enables efficient ways for a better understanding and quality practitioner use by applying quality innovation performance metric. Downside of fixed target type quality performance evaluation metric, and , is presented through experimental study. In contrast, advantage of this study is that high throughput requiring product technology, process technology and quantum leap typed innovation effect is evaluated based on precision and accuracy and Z-Factor that enables relative comparison between enterprises is proposed and implemented.

목차

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. 품질혁신 성능평가 방안과 문제점
  2.1 품질혁신 성능평가 방안
  2.2 연속 식스시그마 실증연구에 의한 품질혁신 성능평가의 분석
 3. High Throughput 프로세스에서 Z-Factor의 의미
 4. 6시그마 적용예
  4.1 Zst, Ppk는 비슷한데도 Z-Factor가 다른 적용예
  4.2 Zst, Ppk는 다른데 Z-Factor가 비슷한 적용예
 5. 결론
 6. 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 최성운 [ Sung-Woon Choi | 가천대학교 산업공학과 ] Corresponding author

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  대한안전경영과학회지 [Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-6783

• eISSN

  2288-1484

• 수록기간

  1999~2025

• 십진분류

  KDC 530 DDC 620