The purpose of this study is to conduct an integrated evaluation of the greenways in Cheongju City in terms of its visual landscape, ecological landscape, and physical connection. For this purpose, the study was conducted in the following four stages. First, evaluation indicators for greenway evaluation were selected based on reviewing previous studies, and field surveys were conducted. Second, findings from the field survey by each evaluation indicator were classified into 5 scales according to a statistical classification system. Third, an expert AHP survey on the evaluation indicators was carried out to calculate the weight of the indicators. Fourth, a greenway integrated-evaluation index was assessed using the findings from the field survey and the weight of indicators. The index was classified into 8 types. The results from the study were as follows. Among the greenways in Cheongju City, two locations (Toad ecological wetland section 2·3) were categorized as visual landscape superiority (type1); three locations (Toad ecological wetland section 1, Uam-mountain section 3, Sangdang Park section 2) as visual & ecological landscape superiority (type2); five locations (Uan-mountain section 1·2, Sangdang Park section 1) as visual & ecological landscape-physical connection inferiority (type3); one location (Jungang Park section 3) as ecological landscape superiority (type4); six locations (Uncheon Park section 2, Janggubong Park section 2, Geumcheon Sports Park section 1·2·3, Jungang Park section 2) as visual landscape-physical connection superiority (type5); two locations (Uncheon Park section 1, Jungang Park section 1) as physical connection superiority (type6) ; three locations (Janggubong Park section 3, Jungheung Park section 2, Sangdang Park section 3) as visual & ecological landscapephysical connection superiority (type7); and two locations (Uncheon Park section 3, Janggubong Park section 1) as ecological landscape-physical connection superiority (type8). The study result indicate that systematic planning is required for the rest of the greenways except of those categorized as type 7 having superior visual and ecological landscape and physical connectivity.
목차
Abstract 1. 서론 2. 이론적 고찰 2.1. 그린웨이 2.2. 가법형 통합지수 산정모형 3. 그린웨이 통합평가 방법 3.1. 대상지 설정 3.2. 그린웨이 현황조사 3.3. 지표별 그룹화 3.4. 가중치 산정 3.5. 그린웨이 평가지수 산정 4. 청주시 그린웨이 통합평가 4.1. 평가영역별 그린웨이 평가 5. 결론 및 시사점 주 참고문헌
한국지역개발학회 [The Korean Regional Development Association]
설립연도
1989
분야
사회과학>지역개발
소개
국토의 균형발전과 도시 및 농촌지역 계획에 관한 이론을 종합적으로 연구하고 지역개발에 관한 학문적, 실용적 연구발전을 통하여 지속가능한 지역발전에 기여함을 목적으로 한다.
또한 세계화 시대에 부응하여 아시아지역의 선도적인 지역개발 경험을 바탕으로 개발도상국가의 지역개발전략 및 개발사업을 지원한다.
간행물
간행물명
한국지역개발학회지 [Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association]