Earticle

초록

영어

Is the Failure of Conquering AI really only because of Achan? - Focused on Critical Analysis on Joshua 7:2-5 Sanglae Kim, Ph.D. Professor, College of Theology Sahmyook University Joshua 7 describes why and how the Israelites failed to conquer the city of Ai when they first tried. It appears that the chapter clearly depicts the reason as the fault of Achan. But if the sin of Acahn is the only reason, the second attempt, after punishing Achan to death, must be the same with the first. But the aspect of second attempt portrayed in chapter 8 is quite different from that of the first in 7:2-5. It means that Achan's case is not the only reason. Comparing the text of Joshua 7:2-5 with that of surrounded chapters, it is clear that the portrayal of Joshua is remarkably different from that in other battle accounts. In other words, this particular text shows no sign of Joshua being a dedicated, sharp warrior. The followings are the images of Joshua we have discovered. First, he did not order any commands to move out or withdraw. He merely kept silent or approved hesitantly. Second, he did not rise early in the morning unlike the other days. This conveys an impression that the mind of the commander in chief was indolent in the time when he should have been sensitive in the field. Third, he was not with the people as in the other battles, nor did he lead out. Fourth, he did not set up any strategy for the battle. Fifth, he did not ask for YHWH's guidance for this battle. Combining all these facts, we are able to conclude that the primary responsibility for failing this battle is on Joshua. However, the text of Joshua 7 is deliberately masking Joshua's mistakes in this campaign. First of all, Joshua 7:1 makes the reader focus on Achan's sin. There is no doubt that Achan's sin was a serious problem among the Israelites, YHWH's covenantal community. Yet the way Joshua 7 is written shows how it is trying to hide Joshua's mistake in relation to Achan's problem. In the following text, 7:2-5, Joshua is completely left out. However, even this literary strategy could not wholly cover Joshua. Critical analysis of the text helps us to understand the reality of the account more clearly beyond the intention of the text.

한국어

이 논문은 여호수아 7장 1-5의 비평적 분석을 통하여 아이성 전투의 실패의 원인을 밝힌다. 필자는 연구의 결과로 본문이 아이 성 정복을 실패한 지휘관 여호수아의 실수를 의도적으로 은폐하고 오직 아간의 범죄에 주목하도록 독자들을 유도하고 있음을 설득력있게 제시한다.

목차

1. 문제의 제기
 2. 성전(Holy War) 텍스트로서의 여호수아 7장 2-5절의 특징
  1) 명령하지 않는 장군 여호수아
  2) “일찍 일어나지 않은” 장군 여호수아
  3) 야훼의 말씀을 구하지 않은 장군 여호수아
  4) 백성들과 함께 하지 않은 장군 여호수아
  5) 아무런 전략을 세우지 않은 장군 여호수아
 3. 요약 및 결론
 4. 참고문헌
 Abstract

키워드

수 7장 2-5절 수 7-8장 아이 성 아간 여호수아 침묵과 생략 비평적 분석 Joshua 7:2-5 Joshua 7-8 city of Ai Achan Joshua Silence and Ellipsis Critical Analysis

저자

• 김상래 [ Sang-Lae Kim | 삼육대 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물