현재 위치
Home
CONSORT statement를 기반으로 한 국내 Science Citation Index 저널과 NEJM의 Randomized Controlled Trial의 abstracts 질적 비교 평가 연구
The quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials abstracts from Korean Science Citation Index journal and NEJM; Evaluation and Comparison of adherence to the CONSORT Statement
-
- 발행기관
- 한국임상약학회 바로가기
-
- 간행물
- 한국임상약학회지 KCI 등재 바로가기
-
- 통권
- 제22권 제2호 (2012.06)바로가기
-
- 페이지
- pp.131-136
-
- 저자
-
- 언어
- 한국어(KOR)
-
- URL
- https://www.earticle.net/Article/A184019
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
4,000원
원문정보
초록
- 영어
- Objective: This study evaluated and compared the adherence to the CONSORT for quality of reports on the randomized controlled trials (RCT) abstracts by four major Korean Science Citation Index (SCI) journals and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Methods: A descriptive analysis of published RCT abstracts in Korean SCI journals and NEJM from 2007/01 to 2011/06 was conducted by two reviewers, independently extracting data from a PubMed search. A modification of CONSORT for abstract was used including 16 checklist items. Reporting of checklist items for individual group was conducted to compare adherence patterns between two groups. Results: We identified the potential 57 RCT abstracts from Korean SCI and 50 from NEJM meeting our inclusion criteria; among them, three abstracts from Korean SCI and one from NEJM were excluded. Among total 16 checklist items based on CONSORT statement, Korean SCI journals and NEJM were statistically equivalent in 4 items; Korean journals were better in three items and NEJM were in nine. The methodological quality domains were inadequately reported in both journals: allocation concealment about 1.9% and 4.0%, and blinding 44.4% and 40.8%. In general, The CONSORT adherence of NEJM was better than that of Korean SCI in the method and result domain (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The quality of NEJM reporting of RCT abstracts was better than that of Korean SCI, in general. This study on adherence of RCT reports from Korean SCI journals and NEJM abstracts to the CONSORT statement reveals that there is a need for improvement, especially Korean SCI. Further investigation on the quality of RCT reports and ways to improve reporting quality is required.
목차
Abstract
연구방법
연구대상
자료수집
자료선택
평가기준
Method
Results
통계분석
결과
항목 별 분석결과
고찰 및 결론
감사의 글
참고문헌
키워드
Randomized controlled trials CONSORT statement Quality of reports SCI저자
간행물 정보
발행기관
-
- 발행기관명
- 한국임상약학회 [Korean College of Clinical Pharmacy]
- 설립연도
- 1
- 분야
- 의약학>약학
- 소개
- 합리적 약물치료(rational pharmacotherapy)의 보장 및 증진을 궁극목적으로 하며 이를 달성하기 위해 임상약학의 발전과 회원 상호간의 친목을 도모한다.
간행물
-
- 간행물명
- 한국임상약학회지 [Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy]
- 간기
- 계간
- pISSN
- 1226-6051
- 수록기간
- 1991~2026
- 등재여부
- KCI 등재
- 십진분류
- KDC 518 DDC 615
이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국임상약학회지 제22권 제2호
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.
출처 : 네이버학술정보
0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.