The copyright system has made changes to new technologies and works, by establishing new objects to be protected, adding rights and so on. It is occurrence of digital copyrighted works based on digital technology that is most remarkable change in the present copyright system. The digital copyrighted works are all the works that can be used as digitalized from existing or new works, which normally have a form of database or can be included in a CD-ROM. Although the copyright infringement through Internet is also an illegal activity by Civil Law, the holders of the right as an intangible property right have difficulty in proving damage caused by the infringement. The Copyright Act of Korea has thus provisions on the relief of the burden of proof of the holders in Articles 125 and 126. However, it is still being considered to be difficult to prove actual damages by copyright infringement, and, what is worse, even if compensatory damages by the infringement are calculated, the amount calculated is such insignificant that it is an ineffective way to prevent pirates from infringing on copyright. Here, the ‘enforcement of Intellectual Property’ of KORUS FTA will bring about a big change to the damages calculation of copyright infringement litigations in Korea; that is about statutory damages. The United States also has special articles of the Copyright Act like Korea, and the statutory damages are most conspicuous. The first requirement for statutory damages is that an infringed work should be a registered one. There are three levels of pre-established damages: willfulness warrants the increase, innocence the decrease, and all the other cases are computed according to the standard measure. Once the verdict of damages is made, a plaintiff cannot select freely statutory damages. Regardless of the number of infringement, statutory damages should be calculated by the number of infringed works which are numbered by their registration. The Korean Copyright Act has had provisons on the presumption of the number of infringing copies since its enactment. The current Korean Copyright Act stipulates in Article 126 that the court may calculate damages, based on a purpose of proceedings and results from evidence examination, if the parties do not submit enough evidence to calculate damages. These institutions are quite different from the statutory damages but can be a good start as a linkage to the statutory damages. On such ground, the feasibility of introduction of the US Statutory Damages as an alternative has been reviewed.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언 Ⅱ. 디지털 저작권의 개념 Ⅲ. 현행 손해배상제도의 검토 1. 민법상 손해배상책임 2. 저작권법상 손해배상책임 3. 현행 손해배상제도의 검토 Ⅳ. 법정손해배상제도 도입에 대한 검토 1. 미국의 법정손해배상제도 2. 법정손해배상제도와 다른 제도와의 구별 3. 우리 저작권법과 법정손해배상제도의 도입 Ⅴ. 결어 참고문헌
민사법의 이론과 실무학회 [The Association of Theory and Practics of Private Law]
설립연도
2002
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
법은 善과 術(Jusest ars boni et eaqui)이라고 한다. 법학 연구의 일반적인 경향은 선과 형평에 관한 문제를 실체법분야에서 총괄적으로 다룬다면, 그 '術'에 해당하는 부분은 소송법 분야에서 다루어진다 할 것이다. 법학은 모름지기 실체법을 외면한 소송법만의 연구가 허탈에 빠지게 되고, 또 소송법을 경시하는 실체법만의 연구도 공허할 수 밖에 없다. 민사법의이론과실무학회는 실체법과 소송법이라는 구체적 전문성의 차이가 있음에도 불구하고 공동발표회를 가짐으로써 상호 보완하고 보다 깊게 민사법 연구의 전문성을 살려나가는데 그 목적이 있다.
간행물
간행물명
민사법의 이론과 실무 [Journal of Theory and Practics of Private Law]