With the courtroom examination taking center stage in the Korean criminal court procedure, a development which is believed to enhance transparency and fairness in court system, a discourse- based study can provide information on the discursive and professional practices of legal professionals. Drawing on the discourse of criminal courtroom interactions in Korea, this paper examines the phenomenon of trial judges’ interruption and its various functions in courtroom trials. Interruptions can be largely divided into cooperative interruption and non-cooperative interruption, but a closer look reveals that judges’ interruption during courtroom proceedings can be seen as part of collaboration and confrontation in the judge’s fact-finding activities, and it demonstrates the judges’ active role in conducting courtroom trials in an efficient and fair way.
목차
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Interruption 3. The data 3.1. Cooperative interruptions 3.2. Non-cooperative interruptions 4. Conclusion References
한국언어연구학회 [The Korean Association of Language Studies]
설립연도
1996
분야
인문학>언어학
소개
한국언어연구학회는 언어학과 언어교육 분야의 연구를 통하하여 학문의 질적 향상과 국내외 회원 및 학회간의 학술 교류와 친목을 도모한다. 이를 위해 학술 연구 발표회, 강연회, 강습회를 개최하고, 정기학회지, 연구보고서, 서적 등을 간행하며, 그 밖에 지역사회에 필요한 사업과 연구 활동을 수행하는데 중점을 두고 있다.