Earticle

초록

영어

The contributed acceptance is usually added to a beneficial administrative act as the form of “Nebenbestimmung”. But it has increased to add it as the form of agreement or contract these days.
The burden contract of contributed acceptance has a characteristic of substitute for the burden as administrative act. The main administrative act relating to the burden contract is based on public law. Therefore, it should be evaluated as a public contract and dealt accordingly.
In the same line, a complainant should be conducted through “allgemeine Leistungsklage” or “Feststellungsklage” as party suit.
If the party defaults on the burden contract, the adminstrative agency is able to file “allgemeine Leistungsklage”. If it is defective on the burden contract, either party is able to nullify the contract through “Feststellungsklage”.
Even if the main administrative act is valid, the burden contact can be partially invalidated or terminated. At this point, the theory of “partial revocation of administrative act” can be analogically applied.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 기부채납 부담계약의 의의와 법적 성질
  1. 기부채납 부담계약의 의의
  2. 기부체납 부담계약의 법적 성질
  3. 기부채납 부담계약의 행정행위 대체가능성
 Ⅲ. 기부채납 부담계약의 위법사유
  1. 공법상 법리의 적용
  2. 민법상 규정의 적용
  3. 공법상 계약의 해제 및 해지
 Ⅳ. 기부채납 부담계약에 대한 쟁송방법
  1. 기부채납 부담계약의 독자성
  2. 공법상 당사자소송
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 정해영 [ Jeong, Hae Young | 변호사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  아주법학 [Ajou Law Research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1976-3115

• 수록기간

  2007~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340