현재 위치
Home
일본의 고용형태를 이유로 한 차별 금지 법제에 관한 연구
A Legal Study on the Japanese Legal System prohibiting discrimination against casual workers
-
- 발행기관
- 아주대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
-
- 간행물
- 아주법학 KCI 등재후보 바로가기
-
- 통권
- 제6권 제1호 (2012.06)바로가기
-
- 페이지
- pp.69-109
-
- 저자
-
- 언어
- 한국어(KOR)
-
- URL
- https://www.earticle.net/Article/A177567
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
8,700원
원문정보
초록
- 영어
- Every country has a legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual
workers to cope with widening disparity between casual workers and
permanent workers. The way that legislation regulating discrimination is
different in Korea and Japan, even though their wage system and
personnel management is very similar. In this regard this paper aims to
review how the Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against
casual workers developed, and what is the standard for resonable cause
of unequal treatment.
The Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual
workers had been made gradually through discussion among labour law
professors. The debate originated from the issue on whether casual
workers were able to be regarded as the social status mentioned in the
article 3 of Labour Standards Law. It moved to the issue that the principal
of equal pay for equal work could be regarded as public order and
standards of decency. Through dialectical process among theories, balanced
treatment principal was settled down as a principal of law to deal with
equity between casual workers and permanent workers in Japan. The
concept of balanced treatment principal is considering significantly Japanese
labour practice, and it can be said to be superordinate concept that includes parity of treatment.
This paper makes proposals based on the Japanese Legal System
prohibiting discrimination against casual workers. For example, it is
necessary to establish rules enhancing casual workers’ comprehension about
labor condition to prevent conflict. Also a committee composed of both
employer and casual workers is needed to introduce to help them resolve
conflict by themselves. In terms of what is the standard for resonable
cause of unequal treatment, representing it by types according to purpose
and nature of labour is helpful to lessen abstractness.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 일본의 고용형태를 이유로 한 차별금지법제의 전개
1. 노동기준법 제3조의 적용 여부
2. 공서(公序) 법리에 의한 보호
3. 일본 노동법제에서 균형처우의 내용 및 의의
Ⅲ. 고용형태를 이유로 한 차별의 합리적 이유
1. 학설
2. 행정 해석
3. 판례
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
A Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers Balanced treatment principal The standard for resonable cause of unequal treatment.저자
간행물 정보
발행기관
-
- 발행기관명
- 아주대학교 법학연구소 [Law Research Institute of Ajou University]
- 설립연도
- 2007
- 분야
- 사회과학>법학
- 소개
- 아주대학교 부설 법학연구소는 법의 이론과 시대적, 사회적 환경에 대응할 수 있는 법률제도를 연구함으로써 법학교육과 법률문화의 발전에 기여하고 법무상담 및 법률구조사업 등을 통하여 국민의 인권옹호에 이바지함을 목적으로 함.
간행물
-
- 간행물명
- 아주법학 [Ajou Law Research]
- 간기
- 계간
- pISSN
- 1976-3115
- 수록기간
- 2007~2026
- 등재여부
- KCI 등재
- 십진분류
- KDC 360 DDC 340
이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 아주법학 제6권 제1호
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.
출처 : 네이버학술정보
0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.