Earticle

현재 위치 Home

논문

중세 교회법에서의 불명예효
Infamy in the Medieval Canon Law

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국서양중세사학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    서양중세사연구 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제28호 (2011.09)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.1-42
  • 저자
    장준철
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A173832

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

8,800원

원문정보

초록

영어

Infamy of Roman Law was accepted in Christian Councils of the fifth century. But a lot of references on infamy were included in Decretum Gratiani of the twelfth century when the decretales were collected most actively. It is from this period that the decretists began to concentrate their debate on infamy. Infamy which was settled in medieval canon law could be divided into three categories, such as infamy of law, canonical infamy, and infamy of fact. Infamy of law came from the result of sentence in the court. It was sentenced to the people who accused priests to the courts, but could not prove, who distorted the abandoned documents of councils, and thieves, in addition to the people who was listed in Roman law. Even though Canonical infamy was caused by criminal and moral sins, it was considered to be very slight infamy. Thus, it could be removed by way of penance. Canonical infamy was just medieval concept which did not have its origin in Roman law. Infamy of fact was caused by rumor and suspicion, rather than real crime. The early decretists called it as mala fama, infamatio, or sinister rumor. Such a kind of infamy could be removed through canonical purgation. Canonical purgation was a ceremony to refine the bad name before the ordination to priest, or performing the canonical right. No matter of kinds, since infamy was caused from the crimes and violations of rule in Christian community, the loss of rights were considered to be indispensible. The disciplines to infamy of law and infamy of fact was almost same, even though those two kind of infamy were different each other. The right to accuse others to the court, ordination to holy position and promotion were prohibited to persons in these infamies. But the people in canonical infamy did not have any loss in any kinds of rights besides penance.

목차

I. 머리말
 II. 판결 불명예(infamia iuris)
  1. 로마법에서의 판결 불명예
  2. 중세 교회법에서의 판결 불명예
 III. 계율 불명예(infamia canonica)
 IV. 사실 불명예(infamia facti)
  1. 로마법의 기원
  2. 중세교회법에서의 사실 불명예
 V. 맺는 말
 

키워드

불명예효 중세교회법 정결례 참회고행 파문 Infamy Medieval canon law Purgation Penitence Excommunication

저자

  • 장준철 [ Chun-Chul, CHANG | 원광대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국서양중세사학회 [The Korean Society For Western Medieval History]
  • 설립연도
    1996
  • 분야
    인문학>역사학
  • 소개
    서양중세사의 연구와 이와 관련된 학술활동 및 정보교류를 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    서양중세사연구 [Journal of Western Medieval History]
  • 간기
    반년간
  • pISSN
    1229-4454
  • 수록기간
    1996~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 920 DDC 940

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 서양중세사연구 제28호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장