Earticle

초록

영어

This study critically reviews the legitimacy of urban planning opposed to a market broadly adopted by planners conventionally. This study critically investigates the concepts of market failures and government failures for the review. Planners have thought planning to be a powerful alternative of the market. However, this study indicates that planners have often misunderstood or exaggerated the reality of market failures. On the other hand, this study finds that the market is a quite excellent mechanism which is able to internalize the costs resulting from market failures while planning has several limits and problems in dealing with the market failures. This study identifies that planning as a regulatory policy is budget-consuming and rent-creating, and can infringe the civil liberty. In conclusion, this study insists that urban planning should legitimate its ontological meaning in the new way, which is more market-oriented.

목차

Abstract:
 1. 서론
  1.1 연구의 배경 및 문제제기
  1.2 선행연구 검토
 2. 전통적 도시계획의 정당성， 그 허와 실
  2.1 계획일반의 필요성
  2.2 시장실패
 3. 한국 공간계획의 실제
  3.1 규제의 복잡성
  3.2 주민참여
  3.3 부문벌 계획 간의 미흡한 연계성
  3.4 장기계획의 문제접
 4. 시장친화적 도시계획의 모색
 5. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 김흥순 [ Kim, Heung-Soon | 한양대학교 도시공학과 부교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국지역개발학회지 [Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association]

• 간기

  연5회

• pISSN

  1225-9055

• 수록기간

  1989~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 322 DDC 330