Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study was to compare Mulligan technique with Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS) in persons with neck pain. Methods : Twenty subjects with neck pain participated in the experiment. All subjects randomly assigned to the Mulligan technique group and TENS group. Both groups receive treatment(Mulligan technique: all areas 8 times once, TENS : 100Hz 15 minute once) 3 times during 2 weeks. And LEX was used to measure range of motion of neck. All measurement of each subject were measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment. Results : 1. All areas of range of motion of neck were significantly increased (p<0.05). 2. These data suggest that Mulligan technique and TENS are beneficial to increase all areas of range of motion of neck. 3. Comparing with two groups, Mulligan technique increases all areas of range of motion of neck more than TENS and appeared significant difference statistically. Conclusion : Mulligan technique is more effective than TENS to increse range of motion in persons with neck pain.

목차

Abstract
 I. 서론
 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법
  1. 연구대상
  2. 연구방법
  3. 측정도구
  5. 자료 처리방법
 Ⅲ. 연구결과
  1. 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성
  2. Mulligan technique과 TENS의 치료 전 ROM 비교
  3. Mulligan technique과 TENS에 따른 전후 Flexion, Extension ROM 비교
  4. Mulligan technique과 TENS에 따른 전후 Rightlateral flexion, Left lateral flexion ROM 비교
  5. Mulligan technique과 TENS에 따른 전후 Right rotation, Left rotation ROM 비교
  6. Mulligan technique과 TENS의 치료 후 ROM 비교
 Ⅳ. 고찰
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 서현규 [ Hyun-Gyu Seo | 대구보건대학 물리치료과 ]
• 공원태 [ Won-Tae Gong | 구미1대학 물리치료과 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  대한정형도수물리치료학회지 [The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1226-3680

• eISSN

  2508-7282

• 수록기간

  1995~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 512 DDC 615