When liabilities of a debtor exceed a liability property, a debtor falls into insolvency. There are many ways that a debtor can take, but there is a method of realizing and allocating the property of a debtor by adjusting legal relation of the stakeholder such as a creditor through bankruptcy or rehabilitation. A law about debtor rehabilitation and bankruptcy regulates this procedure, and it is commonly called the Consolidated Insolvency Act. Consolidated insolvency procedure can be divided into rehabilitation, individual rehabilitation, and individual bankruptcy. Individual rehabilitation applies regulations of individual bankruptcy unless it does not violates the purpose. Individual rehabilitation procedure realizes positive property that a debtor has and distributes it to creditors, and the rest liabilities are exempted. However, there is a case that debtors have priority and it is a bond with a security right. Secured mortgage is divided into consensual liens and statutory liens under a civil law; consensual liens include leasehold right, pledge, (flexible)mortgage, provisional registration security, mortgage of transfer, and mortgage of sale and statutory liens include lien, legal mortgage, tax liability, wage privilege bond, and deposit under house (commercial building) lease protection act. In the Consolidated Insolvency Act. only leasehold right, lien, pledge, (flexible)mortgage, and movables and movables·security right for an obligation under the law about security for an obligation among contract security real rights are recognized as right of separation. Other rights are classified into individual rehabilitation superior obligation or normal bond without a security right. A creditor that has secured mortgage right under the Consolidated Insolvency Act and a general creditor without mortgage show clear difference in its status according to the existence of right of separation. The problem that this study will review in priority is about deposit of a house (commercial building) lessee. In other words, lease deposit return liability that a lessee of house and commercial building has is treated similar as mortgage, lien, the right of pledge, and leasehold rights and classified as a bond conforming to right of separation. Therefore, there is a problem that a lessee can’t be protected properly in individual rehabilitation procedure as lease deposit return liability is treated under right of separation even though it is not intrinsic right of separation but does not have right of bidding request. There are few opinions to solve these irrationalities. However, discussion on the status of a lessee on individual rehabilitation procedure is laid aside in Consolidated Insolvency Act revision. Therefore, this study is to look into problems of Consolidated Insolvency Act revision that is legislated and announced on the date of July 15, 2009 along with questions about the status of a lessee on individual rehabilitation procedure.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 1. 연구의 목적 2. 개인회생절차 3. 별제권과 준별제권 Ⅱ. 임대차보증금반환채권의 법적 성격 Ⅲ. 개인회생절차상 임차인의 지위 1. 우선변제권 여부 2. 경매신청권 여부 3. 별제권 행사 후 잔여채무에 대한 면책 여부 4. 강제집행·가압류 등의 중지·금지 Ⅳ. 별제권 행사로 만족을 얻지 못할 채권액을 정하는 방법 1. 의의 2. 일반 별제권의 처리방법 3. 임대차보증금 반환채권의 처리방법 Ⅴ. 임차인보호를 위한 방안 1. 경매신청권 부여 2. 개인회생변제계획안 상 임차보증금 전액을 유보하는 방안 3. 통합도산법 제625조 제2항의 개정 4. 임차보증금 반환채권을 준별제권으로 분류하지 않는 방안 5. 검토 Ⅵ. 통합도산법의 개정 1. 개정이유 2. 주요내용 3. 개정안에 대한 의견 Ⅶ. 결론 참고문헌
김형진 [ Kim hyung jin | Doctor of laws, part-time instructor in Department of law, college of law graduate school of public administration Dong-eui university college of law ]
민사법의 이론과 실무학회 [The Association of Theory and Practics of Private Law]
설립연도
2002
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
법은 善과 術(Jusest ars boni et eaqui)이라고 한다. 법학 연구의 일반적인 경향은 선과 형평에 관한 문제를 실체법분야에서 총괄적으로 다룬다면, 그 '術'에 해당하는 부분은 소송법 분야에서 다루어진다 할 것이다. 법학은 모름지기 실체법을 외면한 소송법만의 연구가 허탈에 빠지게 되고, 또 소송법을 경시하는 실체법만의 연구도 공허할 수 밖에 없다. 민사법의이론과실무학회는 실체법과 소송법이라는 구체적 전문성의 차이가 있음에도 불구하고 공동발표회를 가짐으로써 상호 보완하고 보다 깊게 민사법 연구의 전문성을 살려나가는데 그 목적이 있다.
간행물
간행물명
민사법의 이론과 실무 [Journal of Theory and Practics of Private Law]