A Study on the Identity of French Culture Kim Nam Youn (Kangwon National University) The paper develops the various liaisons that may be established between the words ‘culture’ and ‘identity’ and through this interaction define as to what may actually constitute as being the dynamics behind cultural understanding. Most of the studies relating to culture and societal environments in the past were largely based on nationalistic movements which were quite frequently influenced by political landscapes of the concerned society. To surmount this obstacle and misunderstandings the paper proposes to delimit the subject of research to, and only to, outstanding cultural aspects. The research will limit and focus on France today, which is a multi-cultural society. The decision to limit the boundaries thus to France was made, in that France had already gone through the turbulence of establishing a multi-cultural society. The cultural superiority theory in France of the ethnic group Gaul, which is an union of German and Frank ethnic societies, is only a nationalistic outburst and has no basis and should not be taken seriously. The historical religious denomination also should be discarded. Even though the Roman Catholics and the Protestants both make up a large part of the population, the French today identify more with laïcité rather then with the traditional religions. The French language should also be taken out of the equation because French as a language only began to be used widely across the country in the latter half of the 19th century. In short, what we mean by French today is rather difficult to discern. And to this end the cultural means may be the last objectival solution as to identify what truly refers to being ‘French.’ The cultural identities of the past and the present that one identifies may give us an insight as to how cultural identity of a society will evolve in the future. To maintain objectivity of the research, words ethnically incorrect will also be addressed. It is to limit general prejudice and occasional stereotyping that one might have to answer to in order for the research to conclude with a satisfying result. Finally, it is necessary not to be satisfied with just a proclamatory result but to see it as an ‘activer’ of cultural circumstances.
국제언어인문학회 [INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HUMANISTIC STUDIES IN LANGUAGE]
설립연도
2000
분야
인문학>언어학
소개
국제언어인문학회는 '언어를 통한 인문학 연구'의 필요성에 동감하는 여러 전공분야 학자들의 뜻을 담고 있습니다. 언어에 초점을 맞추는 것은, 다양한 전공분야의 참여에서 생겨날 수 있는 '이질적 집합'의 상황을 극복하기 위한 장치입니다. 현재로서는 작은 불씨를 지핀 것에 불과합니다. 그러나 이렇게 일구어진 불꽃이 새로운 학풍의 바람결에 커다란 섬광으로 빛나게 될 날이 올 것을 우리는 확신합니다. 우리의 학회와 학술지는 인문학 불변의 가치와 시대적 사명을 인식하는 국내외의 학자들을 향해 활짝 개방되어 있습니다. 특정 전공의 범위를 넘어서서 철학, 문학, 언어학, 종교, 역사, 문화, 예술 등의 시각에서 언어의 본질을 토론할 기회가 될 것입니다.