Earticle

현재 위치 Home

레닌-안지오텐신계에 작용하는 항고혈압 약제의 단독요법과 병용요법의 안전성 및 유효성에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰
Systematic Review : Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Monoand Combination Therapy of Anti-hypertensive Agents Acting on the Renin-Angiotensin System

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국임상약학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    한국임상약학회지 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제21권 제4호 (2011.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.364-375
  • 저자
    최경업, 김현경
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A163340

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

4,300원

원문정보

초록

영어
Given that single blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) can achieve only partial and undurable suppression of the Renin Angiotensin System (RAS), it has been hypothesized that dual blockage would be more beneficial in the management of blood pressure (BP) reduction and prevention of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) than either agent alone. Thus, it has been suggested that the combination of an ACEI and an ARB might provide renal benefits to hypertensive patients over and above BP reduction. However, this might also expose patients to additive or synergistic side effects. We attempted to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of combination therapy in hypertensive patients with or without kidney diseases. MEDLINE and KoreaMed were searched for relevant randomized clinical trials in adult hypertensive patients with or without diabetes (restricted to 1997, limited to trials published in English). Results were summarized using the random- effects model, and between-studies heterogeneity was estimated with I2. A final analysis of ten trials (23,928 patients) revealed that the combination of an ACEI and an ARB reduced blood pressure (SBP/DBP) by 3.95/2.02 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.38 to -3.53/-2.33 to - 1.71) compared with ACEI monotherapy, and 2.83/2.64 mmHg (95% CI, -3.25 to -2.41/- 4.95 to -0.33) compared with ARB monotherapy. Eight trials (391 patients) demonstrated a significant reduction in 24h- proteinuria (weighted mean difference, 0.16 g/day, 95% CI, -0.26-0.05), but they did not translate into an improvement in GFR. Tests for heterogeneity showed no difference in effect among the studies. The combination therapy reduced proteinuria by 30% (95% CI, 23% to 37%) and 39% (95% CI, 31% to 48%) compared with ACEI monotherapy and ARB monotherapy, respectively. However, in patients who had proteinuria more than 0.5 g/day, the combination therapy failed to show significant reduction in urinary protein excretion. The current cumulative evidence suggests that diabetic patients with proteinuria on dual RAS blockade have an increase risk of adverse events such as hyperkalemia, hypotension, and so on, compared with ACEI or ARB alone. It is, therefore, proposed that the combination therapy should not be routinely used for the treatment of hypertension with or without compelling indications.

목차

Abstract
 Methods
  Literature Search Strategy
  Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
  Data Extraction
  Statistical Analysis
 Results
  Search Results and Trial Characteristics
  Study Outcomes
 Discussion and Conclusion
 References

키워드

angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors angiotensin receptor blockers combination therapy hypertension diabetes proteinuria systematic review

저자

  • 최경업 [ Kyung Eob Choi | 한국약료경영학회 ] Correspondence
  • 김현경 [ Hyunkyung Kim | CJ제일제당(주) ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국임상약학회 [Korean College of Clinical Pharmacy]
  • 설립연도
    1
  • 분야
    의약학>약학
  • 소개
    합리적 약물치료(rational pharmacotherapy)의 보장 및 증진을 궁극목적으로 하며 이를 달성하기 위해 임상약학의 발전과 회원 상호간의 친목을 도모한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    한국임상약학회지 [Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1226-6051
  • 수록기간
    1991~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 518 DDC 615

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국임상약학회지 제21권 제4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장