Earticle

초록

영어

An award for a contract with the government cannot be decided based only on the lowest price. Government is using a Qualification System (QS) to select the best supplier. However, the weight of evaluation that is used in the QS was assigned without an expert's opinion. The purpose of this paper is to approach the alternative method that aims to weigh evaluation elements. For this purpose, this paper adopts AHP methodology that is being used widely in decision making. So far, a number of papers have reported that AHP is appropriate in making multi-criteria decisions by deriving ratio scales from paired comparisons. Some interesting results were found from this approach. One of the elements, such as contract performance in value, was seven times higher than the current value. To explain the differences between the current weight and the weight determined in this study, this paper uses real data that was evaluated in 2010.This study proposes that QS has to adopt a systematic method like AHP to support its goals In addition, this study is recommending a more efficient process considering the results.

목차

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. 물품 적격심사의　현상 진단 및 문제점 분석
 3. AHP 기법을 적용한 가중치 산정
 4. AHP 결과 분석 및 적용
 5. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 장희선 [ Jang, Hee Seon | 방위사업청 방산지원과 국산화계획담당 ] 교신저자
• 박명섭 [ Park, Myong Sub | 고려대학교 경영학과 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국방위산업학회지 [Journal of the Korean Association of Defense Industry Studies]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1738-6144

• 수록기간

  2000~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 390 DDC 355