Earticle

초록

영어

The history of the new theory presented by me, “Baekje was a country of conquest.”, has not been peaceful at all. It has faced ups and downs all. Regardless its feasibility, it shows a live example symbolizing what kind of ‘hardship’ is waiting for presentation of a new theory. I thought of the theory, “Baekje was a country of conquest.”, when I was 31 years old and first presented it in relation to origin of Baekje in 1988. Since then, I have come through hard ways. “I have written only easy articles for just easy life”, said an elderly scholar. I, however, have experienced the world totally different from that of such scholar. I have spent a number of suffering nights having been slandered. “I cannot help but saying in advance that no other argument can be more exceptional than his theory”, a person said regarding the theory, “Baekje was a country of conquest.”, which I presented. The born problem of the theory, “Baekje was a country of conquest.”, lay actually on the redoubtable explosive power of ‘the most exceptional’ argument. Therefore, my theory has come over many peaks of hardship since its birth. Thereby, I was almost dead and also sick. That is, I have clearly experienced what price I should pay for presentation of an ‘exceptional’ new theory. I, however, believe that the truth will be distorted by any indication without the attitude that is basically required, which, furthermore, causes an acute damage. Wouldn’t it be a contemporary version of Jirokwima (指鹿爲馬: Call a deer a horse.) if they distorted the detail itself of my theory?

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. ‘Neo 백제 정복국가론’과 그에 대한 왜곡상
 Ⅲ. 맺음말--新說이 걸어 온 ‘가시밭 길’
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 李道學 [ 이도학 | 한국전통문화학교 문화유적학과 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국전통문화연구 [The Journal of Cultural Heritage]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  1598-9097

• 수록기간

  2003~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 911 DDC 951