Earticle

현재 위치 Home

막스 베버의 ‘도시’ 개념과 수용: ‘서양 중세 도시’를 중심으로
The Concept ‘City’ of Max Weber and Its Reception: In Consideration with the ‘Occidental Medieval City’

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국서양중세사학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    서양중세사연구 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제22호 (2008.09)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.191-221
  • 저자
    안상준
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A141356

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

7,200원

원문정보

초록

영어
Weber's city-study began with his questions why the modern captitalism and the modern civil society could have emerged only in europe and why their origins could be found decisively in medieval cities of europe, but not in ancient cities. It was associated naturally with the 19th century historiography which have sought the historical identity of the modern citizenship. In the 󰡔Stadt󰡕 he showed the arguments which depend largely on the his peculiar city concept as a idealtype. Through a idealtypical city concept of macroscopic and static perspectives he informed us of the way which enabled us to understand the city as a universal phenomenon in comparison with different cultural areas or epochs, although it had not originated from his own thinking. From various viewpoints his concept has come in for criticism. Methodologically it has been pointed out that the idealtype could not really comprehend the processes of historical phenomena. One criticized that historical phenomena could not in general be understood by a theoretical scheme. Furthermore, it was stated that all of the city-theories were useless for the city studies, so that they must be abolished. There remains still the controversy on the leading groups of communes who should have acted, according to Weber, appropriate on medieval economy. In recent studies the communes are regarded as social products with historical contexts rather than as political creatures which had been emerged with some events since the 11th century. The city-rural relatioship, in which the rural society should be dependent on th city, would be transferred with the formulation ‘the conquest of the city by the rural society’. Even it is pointed out that the difference between homo politicus and homo oeconomicus is simply a theoretical scheme. In spite of such different criticisms Weber has provided the historical city-study a new horizon of the cultural aspect in contrast to the 19th century urban history which had paid attention to the institutional and regal aspects. In the other hand it is due mainly to his city concept that the 20th century historiography of medieval city have developed in various directions. Therefore it should be continued to investigate his city concept with historical data or in historical contexts.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 이념형적 '중세도시' 개념의 발생사
 III. '서양 중세 도시' 개념의 본질적인 문제들
  1. '도시공동체'
  2. '코뮌'
  3. 'Homo oeconomicus'
 IV. '서양 중세 도시' 개념과 코뮌 연구
 V. 결론
 < Abstract>
 <참고문헌>

키워드

도시 개념 이념형 도시공동체 코뮌 중세도시 사학사 City Concept Idealtype City Community Commune Medieval City Historiography

저자

  • 안상준 [ Sang- Joon Ahn | 안동대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국서양중세사학회 [The Korean Society For Western Medieval History]
  • 설립연도
    1996
  • 분야
    인문학>역사학
  • 소개
    서양중세사의 연구와 이와 관련된 학술활동 및 정보교류를 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    서양중세사연구 [Journal of Western Medieval History]
  • 간기
    반년간
  • pISSN
    1229-4454
  • 수록기간
    1996~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 920 DDC 940

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 서양중세사연구 제22호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장