The purpose of this study is to analyze how people understand judgments of an umpire in fencing competitions and in which way problems can be improved. To achieve study goals, the research subjects are 196 people from college and general players, two leaders and two players registered as the players in Korea Fencing Federation were selected for the study. Also, questionnaires were distributed and in-dept interviews have been done to establish data bases. To analyze them, in case of the understanding of an umpire’s judgment, SPSS 15.0 was adopted for the frequency analysis. In addition, for in-dept interviews, a transcriber, coding and title creation techniques were employed, and to support the study’s validity, evaluation by research participants, triangulation and cooperation among colleagues have been performed. The study results are as follows. First, fairness of judgment by an umpire at fencing competitions and its perception by fencing players indicate average points. For them, they have defeated on competitions due to unfairness of judgment and acknowledged that the reason for it is because an umpire was not qualified enough to give fair judgment. Second, for the solution, training to make fair judgment, the systems producing good umpires, educating expert umpires and fair designation of umpires are required.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 Ⅱ. 연구방법 1. 연구대상 2. 자료수집 3. 자료분석 Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의 1. 심판판정에 대한 인식 2. 심판판정의 개선방안 Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
현대사회에 있어서 신체활동 연구의 주요 탐구과제는 ‘신체활동을 통한 교육’으로부터 ‘인간의 기본적인 움직임’을 목표로 하는 스포츠적인 움직임을 중심으로 한 생명 활동의 개념으로 급속히 변화되고 있는 추세이다. 이러한 환경변화에 대응하기 위하여 본학회는 ‘체육’적인 요소에서 ‘스포츠’적인 요소를 중심으로 한 학문적 정체성을 견고히 하고, 정기적인 학술지 발간과 학술활동을 통해 한국스포츠츠 문화의 발전과 학문적인 발전에 기여하는데 그 목적이 있다.