Earticle

초록

영어

This paper discusses the determinism fallacy of the probe-goal checking theory of movement (Chomsky 2000, 2001) with respect to ambiguity of interpretive effects and proposes an alternative theory of movement that overcomes the determinism fallacy, i.e., the non-deterministic theory of movement. This paper proposes and motivates a non-deterministic theory of movement based on the notion of edge feature (EF) (Chomsky 2008). It will be claimed that the theory of movement based on EF, i.e., the theory of unmarked vs. marked internal merge (IM), is free from the determinism fallacy of the deterministic probe-goal checking theory of movement. Unmarked IM is characterized as inducing a default semantic effect, called a "D-effect", which simply results from the optionality of the operation of unmarked IM itself (Fox 2000), whereas marked IM is characterized as inducing a marked semantic effect called a "gNon-D-effect,"h due to the lexical properties of the head inducing the marked IM and the phrase undergoing the marked IM---leading to a theory of non-determinism.

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Unmarked vs. Marked IM
 3. Interpretive Effects
  3.1. Assignment of Interpretive Effects
  3.2. Variability of Interpretive Effects
 4. Ambiguity of Interpretive Effects
 5. Extended Notion of Interpretive Effects
 6. Non-Determinism and Flexible Syntax
 7. Conclusion
 References

키워드

저자

• Dong-Whee Yang [ Seoul National University ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  언어 [Korean Journal of Linguistics]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-4039

• 수록기간

  1976~2017

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 710 DDC 195