Earticle

초록

영어

The act of state doctrine is derived from two statements by the Supreme Court of the United States. In Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897), the Supreme Court said, “Every sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State, and the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory. Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves.” In Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 428, the Supreme Court held that “the Judicial Branch will not examine the validity of a taking of property within its own territory by a foreign sovereign government.” This is to deal with the question as follows: “Are those two cases the same or should they be distinguished each other?”

목차

I. 서론
 II. 국가행위이론의 유형
 III. 미국 국가행위이론의 원칙과 예외
  1. 성립배경과 의의
  2. 제2차 Hickenlooper 수정 조항의 해석과 적용
  3. 예외에 관한 기타의 논의들
 IV. 비교 분석과 평가를 통한 미국 국가행위이론의 재구성
 V. 결론
 참고문헌
 

키워드

저자

• 김민서 [ Kim, Min-Seo | 경북대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340