Earticle

초록

영어

These days, with advancement of scientific investigation method, the process of evidence collection has been on gradual increase of cases to the entire human body as an objective and core evidence collecting means.
Nevertheless, the investigation about inside body has no little possibility to cause the physical disability and damage of the object or significantly infringe on personality right by nature. After all, in the process of discovering substantial truth, it is an issue to be discussed from the viewpoint of how to protect the human right of the party concerned. Here it will not always desirable to absolutely deny and prohibit forced outlets of objects in a throat conducted under very strict requirements and standards before proceeding research into other substitute means except for forced outlets of objects in a throat. Finally, it will have to accept that to the category of law by setting out written provisions on stern requirements and procedures to minimize infringement on personality right. So we can refer to § 81a, the criminal procedure law, Germany from a theory of legislation.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
 Ⅱ. 연하물 강제배출의 성격과 허용 여부
  1. 연하물 강제배출의 성격
  2. 허용 여부
 Ⅲ. 허용요건
  1. 압수대상물 존재의 명백성
  2. 강제배출의 필요성
  3. 증거로서의 중요성(증거사용의 보충성)
  4. 배출방법의 상당성
 Ⅳ. 절차
  1. 영장의 종류
  2. 관련 문제
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

키워드

저자

• 신이철 [ Shin, Yi-Chul | 건동대학교 행정학부(경찰행정) 교수. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340