Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

의료관광에 따른 의료분쟁에 있어서 국제재판관할
International Juridical Jurisdiction on medical dispute out of medical travel and tourism

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제26집 제4호 (2010.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.255-291
  • 저자
    강명구
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A133190

원문정보

초록

영어
A medical tourism is one of the most high value industry in Korea.
Korean government and local government try to pursuit promoting business of medical tourism in oder to get the new benefit model from medical tourism.
In the process of medical tourism business, the medical disputes have increased continuously. If an international dispute occurs in medical tourism, it naturally involves a question about the country of which court may have jurisdiction over the medical dispute. Therefore we need to consider the international jurisdiction issues as a possible method of dispute resolution which is satisfactory both patient and medical institution.
In medical dispute out of medical tourism, a claim for damages is theorized by two point of legal view. One is responsibility by breach of contract, the other is responsibility by an unlawful act or tort.
Under the general theory about international jurisdiction, the court which is in the place of performance of a duty in the contract has the jurisdiction in case of breach of contract. Also, the court of locus delicti where unlawful act or misfeasance is committed has the jurisdiction in case of tort. In both case, our country in which medical service is made has the international jurisdiction.
But in each case, there are some exceptions about general international jurisdiction theory. In the breach of contract, consumer contract is consist of the exception. By the article 27th of our private international law, medical consumer bring a suit in the country in which he has his habitual residence. In unlawful act theory, the place in which the result occurs and also the place in which unlawful act is conduct are the place of locus delicti which has the same jurisdiction.
Therefore, probably foreign country has the international jurisdiction in case of medical dispute out of medical tourism. So we need to consider the legal issue about recognition of foreign judgment and this paper deal with the requirements for recognition of foreign judgement.
Especially, this paper deal with the problem whether we recognize the effect of the foreign judgment which has the institution of damages that are different from ours when the verdict of foreign judgment include punitive damages. Because, the recognition of foreign judgement cannot be made if the punitive damages is against to good public order and customs.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 의료관광의 의의
  2. 의료관광의 현황
  3. 의료관광을 둘러싼 법적 문제
 Ⅱ. 국제재판관할(직접관할)
  1. 서
  2. 외국의 경우
  3. 우리 나라
 Ⅲ. 국제재판관할의 합의
  1. 서
  2. 국제적 동향
  3. 우리 나라
 Ⅳ. 외국판결의 승인(간접관할)
  1. 서
  2. 외국판결의 승인 요건
  3. 소결
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

키워드

International Jurisdiction Medical Dispute Medical Travel and Tourism Breach of Contracts Tort Consumer Contracts.

저자

  • 강명구 [ Kang, Myung-Gu | 한남대학교 법과대학 교수, 변호사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제26집 제4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장