Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

선행자백과 등가치진술의 이론
Preceding Confession and Theory of Equivalent Statement

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제26집 제4호 (2010.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.157-175
  • 저자
    이정환
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A133186

원문정보

초록

영어
Confession (Geständnis) generally means that at a pleading date or a preliminary pleading date, a party make a statement unfavorable to himself which, however, complies with the other party's argument. Confession in itself means to admit such a fact unfavorable to himself as true that the other party insists, and it is a confession at a trial if stated during a pleading date or a preliminary pleading date and it has a special meaning at a civil suit which adopts defense principle for the effect of litigation.
In addition, once confession is established, it is unnecessary to prove its validity. Therefore, the one who bears the burden of proof regarding the confession becomes free from such burden and a court has to adopt such a confession as a basis of judgment even if the court has got a belief different from the confession of a party. A confession at a trial is a kind of action and therefore, it has to fulfill effective requirements of litigation to be valid.
Accordingly, a party must possess litigation capacity. Establishment of a confession begins with concurrent statements of both parties. Generally speaking, the other party's statement precedes a confession and then confession is established by admitting such statement later. However, a party may make a statement unfavorable to himself in advance and then the other party quotes it afterward for a confession to be established.
If a party voluntarily makes a statement unfavorable to himself in advance and then the other party quotes it explicitly or makes a statement complying with said unfavorable fact, this binds a court which becomes obliged not to acknowledge a fact contradictory to said fact. Also, it is necessary for both parties' arguments are consistent each other if a party voluntarily makes a statement unfavorable to himself in advance and then the other party quotes it and therefore, the party who makes an unfavorable statement is entitled to withdraw his own statement and to freely make a statement contradictory to previous one prior to the other party's quotation.
This is a problem related to preceding confession.
This study looks into a problem related to preceding confession among various kinds of confession (Geständnis). What is preceding confession, This study will examine which binding power preceding confession has on parties and court. In addition, a preceding confession, which means the situation that a party made a statement unfavorable to himself in advance but the other party has not yet quoted it is distinguished from a confession at a trial, and with respect to a preceding confession this study looks into a theory of equivalent statement being argued in Germany and Japan.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
 Ⅱ. 선행자백
  1. 선행자백의 의의
  2. 선행자백에서의 원용
  3. 선행자백의 구속력
 Ⅲ. 등가치진술의 이론
  1. 서
  2. 등가치진술의 개념과 문제제기
  3. 등가치진술 이론의 근거제시
  4. 등가치진술의 이론을 부정하는 견해
  5. 소결
 Ⅳ. 결어
 참고문헌
 

키워드

Confession at a trial Preceding confession Quoted Verhandlungsmaxime Theory of equivalent Statement.

저자

  • 이정환 [ Lee, Jeong-Hawn | 원광대학교 법과대학 법학부 강사 · 벽성대학 부동산행정과 강사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제26집 제4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장