Earticle

초록

영어

This study has two purposes. One is to systematize a number of referents and to examine the types of comparisons. The other is to examine categories of comparative standards such as inputs in equity theory. In pay comparison process, referents and inputs are very important elements. The first factor analysis is related to referents, which include 18 variables in 6 categories were subjected to factor analysis. 3 factors emerge with an eigenvalue of 1.0 or greater. Factor I, economic need, includes referents in personal worth and system referent. Factor II, market comparison, includes internal and external referents except one variable(external-peer). Between internal and external referents is not distinguished. This result is corresponded with Hills'(1980) and Hong's(1995) findings. FactorIII is named 'historical/social comparisons'. 14 inputs are subjected to the second factor analysis. 3 factors emerge with an eigenvalue of 1.0 or greater. The 5 variables loading on factor I, equity standard, are responsibility, competency, effort, outcome, and skill. FactorII, equality standard, includes age, gender, and education. FactorIII, seniority standard, includes career and company tenure. All the factors are positively associated with each other. Especially, personal worth is associated with equity standard(r=0.50466). Internal and external referents are associated with any comparative standard.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
  1. 비교대상
  2. 비교기준
 Ⅲ. 연구방법
  1. 표 본
  2. 설문구성
  3. 분석방법
 Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
  1. 요인분석
  2. 비교대상과 비교기준과의 상관관계
 Ⅴ. 결 론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

저자

• 홍광훈 [ Hong, Kwang-hoon | 순천청암대학 세무회계과 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  경영과 정보연구 [Management Information Systems review]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-2459

• 수록기간

  1997~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 325 DDC 658