Earticle

현재 위치 Home

석유․가스전 개발에 있어서의 수용 또는 국유화 - 간접적․점진적 국유화를 중심으로 -
Nationalization or Expropriation in the Development of Oil・Gas - Focused on Indirect・Creeping Expropriation -

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제26집 제3호 (2010.09)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.9-43
  • 저자
    류권홍
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A128319

원문정보

초록

영어
The expropriation is the most critical issue in development of oil and gas to International Oil Companies. Huge amount of money and high techs are required for oil and gas exploration and exploitation. With expropriation, investors will lose assets invested in oil development and the chance to get oil or gas being produced from the project, resulting to be the serious threat to any International Oil Company.
There were so many examples of outright expropriation in Iran, Libya, and Mexico in former century. But, the method of expropriation has been different due to the political and economic circumstances. Historically, it is the trend that expropriation follows the favorable policy of host government to International Oil Company to lure them for the country’s economical purpose.
The basic rationales of expropriation have been self defense, independence, sovereignty, and the principle of equity. Resource nationalism became an international custom since 1952, UN resolution 626 and 1962 UN resolution 1803.
The expropriation without compensation is deemed to be an illegal one.
However, if expropriation has public interest and is indiscriminative with fair and just compensation in accordance with due process of law, the expropriation is legal under the public international law.
In this article, the cause and background of expropriation are dealt with, then the difference between outright and creeping, direct and indirect expropriation became expropriation are ‘expropriation’ is the critical issue because of the face that expropriation will be given any compensation, while there will be compensation for any action by the host government which is not expropriation.
The final issue in this research is how to decide the amount of compensation. This issue has practical meaning. Theoretically, whether restitution is possible for illegal expropriation and how to account the amount as the compensation in legal expropriation are hot problems.
Although there are judicial and theoretical solutions for compensation, in practice whether the judicial decision might be enforced should be considered.
As a company which wants to develop oil and gas in overseas, it has to anticipate the most serious political issue, expropriation, and to prepare for any solution before. Prudent consideration and to make the agreement with practical manner with keeping the understanding on the actual result of expropriation in mind are necessarily required.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 수용 또는 국유화의 원인과 역사적 배경
 1. 거래의 퇴행성(Obsolescent Bargain)
 Ⅲ. 국유화와 수용
  1. 국유화․수용의 개념과 적법성의 기준
  2. 수용 또는 국유화의 종류
  3. 간접적 국유화
  4. 국유화 대상(목적물)
  5. 수용 또는 국유화 조치에 대한 대책
 Ⅳ. 수용 또는 국유화에 따른 보상(배상)
  1. 보상(배상)113)의 기준에 대한 이론적 전개
  2. 보상 기준에 관한 사례
  3. 배상액 산정의 방법
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

키워드

Expropriation Indirect Expropriation Outright Outright Expropriation Confiscation Resource Nationalism Calvo Doctrine Illegal Expropriation.

저자

  • 류권홍 [ Ryu, Kwon-Hong | 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수, 변호사 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제26집 제3호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장