Earticle

현재 위치 Home

일제 하 ‘대만의식’의 형성 배경과 그 성격
"Taiwanese Consciousness" During Japanese Colonization: Its Formational Background and Characteristics

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국중앙사학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    중앙사론 바로가기
  • 통권
    제31집 (2010.06)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.155-196
  • 저자
    손준식
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A122020

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
This article deals with the speculation on the formational background and characteristics of "Taiwanese consciousness" during the Japanese colonization, which becomes the mental background of Taiwanese liberation theory, that is, the biggest issue of the current Taiwanese society. The Taiwanese society during the Chung Dynsty was not equipped with the condition to develop "Taiwanese consciousness" on the basis of the territorial identity of Taiwan. It was because Taiwan at that time was regionally divided into several districts between north and south, which were rarely contacted with one another, and thereby, its administrative districts were also determined by this regional restrictions, and each administrative districts developed its own discrete community on the basis of "township economy." Furthermore, in the early stage of main Chinese immigration to Taiwan, the immigrants considered regional consolidation as important, and built their community on the basis of their regional language identity. In fact, these immigrants regarded their regional hometown of China as their place of identification, and thus, their regional consciousness was very strong, causing frequent conflicts between different regional groups. Since then, as the main Chinese immigrants (the people of Han tribes) got domesticated in Taiwan, the regional consciousness got blurred and a new collective consciousness to consider Taiwan as their object of identity emerged by 1860s. However, this took the time of Japanese colonization to get concertized as a complete Taiwanese consciousness. Japan could occupy Taiwan as a result of the Sino-Japanese War, but it paid the big price to cope with the strong resistance by Taiwanese people. However, most of anti-Japanese resistances by armed Taiwanese people were pre-modern forms of protest based upon Chung dynasty as their national identity or setting up the motto for the change of old dynasty. In this respect, the Taiwanese society in the early stage of Japanese colonization could not form the Taiwanese national identity as well as the Taiwanese consciousness as their local identity. By the animosity against their betrayed country and the love for their land as well as the separation policy of Japanese colonial government, Taiwanese people were getting segregated from China and accumulated Taiwanese consciousness against the exploitation and racial discrimination by the Japanese colonial government. After their occupation of Taiwan, Japan stabilized the public security by subduing the protest groups, and built up the infrastructure of capitalist system by renovating the real estate controlling system and constructing the transportation system. They also set up the colonial economic system to make Taiwan as a place for providing food and tropical products. Japanese colonial exploitation could be found in the tax burden of Taiwanese people and the heavy influx of Japanese industrial capital as well as the percentage of industrial laborers and teenage laborers. It could be also found in the confiscation of pageantry lands by allowing the Japanese capital group to use those lands as well as the policy of allowing Japanese sugar company to control the price of sugar cane products. On the one hand, Japan set up the despotic system to control rights and duties of Taiwanese people by adopting acting- legislature system, and this tendency continued in the general governor system. To maintain this system, the Japanese colonial government functioned as a police state by employing the intimidating and vast power of the police. The police threatened Taiwanese people to obey the government and discriminated them with their power and authority. The racial discrimination to Taiwanese people was done in the recruitment of government officials, their promotion and salary as well as the education opportunity and content, teacher's quality, education budget and school admission system. Particularly, school education functioned as a means of reconfirming the social relationship and political role between the oppressors and the oppressed. On the other hand, various policies by Japanese colonial government in Taiwan resulted in the consolidation of Taiwanese modern consciousness and the figuring out of regional problems, even though they were originally for the benefit of Japan. The construction of transportation network promoted social mobility, and thereby, it narrowed down the distance between ethnic groups. The currency reform and measure reform instigated the distribution of the goods and the capital. Japanese language policy eradicated the serious communication problems that many dialects caused among the local tribes. As a result, the consolidation between local tribes was strengthened and the local township based economy was converted into the national market economy. Also, industrialization and urbanization promoted social communication in Taiwan, and thus, propelling the formation of Taiwanese consciousness. By these background that I mentioned above, the Taiwanese consciousness as a local identity became dominant by 1920s, and it was confirmed by the use of the term "Taiwan" and the "Taiwanese people." The Taiwanese imagination, which started by Taiwanese students in Japan, became stronger by anti-colonial resistance, but it broke up by the strategic conflicts. By the attitude to national identity and the means of movement, The anti-colonial movement of the Taiwanese people during the Japanese colonization can be categorized into "Nationality Group", "Watching Group", "Taiwanese Revolution Group," and "Enlightenment Group." "Nationality Group" and "Watching Group" set the return to China as their ultimate goal, and in that sense, these two groups looked similar in their identity attitude, but "Nationality Group" was protesting in the mainland of China while "Watching Group" was in Taiwan and they could not but admit the Japanese power. "Watching Group" recognized that they could not liberate Taiwan from Japanese power, but they adopted the strategy of distinguishing Taiwanese people from Japanese people by employing "Han Race" and "China-centric Ethnicity" for the consolidation of Taiwanese people. Consequently, they promulgated "Taiwanese consciousness" as an independent local unit, representing the Chinese consciousness in reaction to Japanese consciousness. "Taiwanese Revolution Group", which was led by the leftist intellectuals, tened toward the class movement, even though they promulgated "Taiwanese Nationality" and "Taiwanese Independence". The Taiwanese liberation, which was the motto of "Nationality Group", only implied the liberation from Japan. On the other hand, Taiwanese consciousness of "Taiwan Literary Group" which represented "Enlightenment Group" was different from Chinese consciousness in that they put an emphasis on the dominancy of Taiwanese literature.

목차

머리말
 Ⅰ. 청대 대만의 중국 전통 지방의식
 Ⅱ. 일제의 식민지 착취와 민족차별정책
  1. 식민지 착취
  2. 민족차별정책
 Ⅲ. 일제의 근대화와 동화정책
 Ⅳ. 일제 하 ‘대만의식’의 성격
 맺음말
 참고문헌
 Abstract

키워드

Japanese colonialism Taiwanese consciousness Colonial exploitation National discriminationpolicy Modernization Assimilation policy

저자

  • 손준식 [ Sohn, Jun-shik | 중앙대학교 역사학과 교수 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국중앙사학회 [Korean Association of Joong-Ang Historical Studies]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    인문학>역사학
  • 소개
    중앙사학연구회를 중앙사학회로 명칭을 변경함. 중앙사학연구회는 중앙대학교 사학과를 모체로 출발한 연구회였다. 주로 중앙대학교 사학과와 연관을 가진 사람들로 회원이 구성되었으며, 또한 그들의 연구활동의 무대가 되어 온 셈이다. 그러나 이러한 성격의 연구회는 자연히 그 활동과 연구의 지평이 제한을 받을 수 밖애 없다는 것을 지적하는 회원들이 많았다. 뿐만 아니라, 최근 한국학계에서 제기된 학술지 평가문제에 적극적으로 대처해야한다는 공감대가 형성되었다. 어느 곳에 게재된 것이 중요한 것이 아니라 그 글의 내용을 가지고 평가해야 한다는 고전적인 의견에 회의를 품는 분위기가 팽창하고 있다. 이러한 과정을 거쳐서 중앙사학연구회의 명칭을 발전적으로 고쳐보고 조직도 전국적인 규모로 만들자는 데 합의하게 되었다. 그러나 명칭을 무엇으로 하느냐 하는 문제를 놓고 또 다시 1년여를 보냈다. 그 결과, 2000년 겨울 동계 정기 워크숍에서 회원들의 투표를 거쳐서 중앙사학회로 결정하였다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    중앙사론 [JOONGANG SARON ; Journal of Joong-Ang Historical Studies]
  • 간기
    반년간
  • pISSN
    1229-3652
  • 수록기간
    1972~2011
  • 십진분류
    KDC 905 DDC 905

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 중앙사론 제31집

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장