공무원과 일반근로자 사이의 징계 기타 불이익처분에 관한 비교
A Comparative Study on the Disciplinary and Dismissal of or Discrimination against an Employee between the Public Sector and the Private Sector
I intended to study a comparative research with respect to disciplinary and other discriminations between the public sector and the private sector. Conclusions are as follows: First, the guarantee of the public servant's status is provided in our constitution, article 7. The disciplinary and other discriminative treatments to the public servants, however, can be taken to maintain internal order in public official society. By the way, at the same time, these treatments can not be justified always. Here the appeal procedure is provided by the Government Official Act or the local Government Official Act to recover the public servant's rights from the disciplinary and other disadvantage treatments. In another way, the dismissal of the employee by its employer is restricted by the Labor Standards Act. Second, kinds of the disciplinary and other disadvantage treatments against the public servants are provided in law concerned, but those of employees in the private sector are provided in the rules of employment which employer makes etc. An agreement or opinion of the disciplinary committee is required to dismiss the public servants by the appointer, but it is not required in the case of the employees in the private sector. Third, the judging institution for the public servant is established within a same public organization. But in the case of the employee in the private sector, the judging institution for the employee is established in an independent organization, and is also operated independently. Finally, a legal status of the public servant is more advantage than that of the employee in the private sector in the case of disciplinary and other disadvantage treatments, Because the disciplinary and other disadvantage treatments are regulated by the law strictly. Employees in the private sector, however, are more advantage than that of the public servant in the appeal procedure, because the judging institution for employees in the private sector is an independent organization, and it has also a reconciliation process as well as judgement.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기 Ⅱ. 징계, 해고 사유 Ⅲ. 징계 등 처분 절차 Ⅳ. 처분에 대한 구제절차 Ⅴ. 공무원과 근로자의 징계 등 비교 Ⅵ. 결론 참고문헌 Abstract
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.