The Trade Unions Act, 1926 has some shortcomings in the provisions of formation and recognition of trade unions. They are (a) no provisions for statutory union recognition; (b) lack of the method for ascertaining union membership; (c) to allow the trade union to enroll outsiders as members; (d) no prescription of the time limit within which the Registrar of Trade Unions is to grant or deny registration, etc. The Government of India has, however, not exerted itself to correct these shortcomings for more than 80 years and has perpetuated a weak and divided labour movement. And moreover, as long as the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 gives to Labour Ministers or Chief Ministers the plenary power to settle industrial disputes, workers will continue to be dependent on outside politicians who have contacts at these Ministers. All this has seriously vitiated not only the trade unions but the industrial scene in India as a whole. Strikes and lock-outs are rampant, although they are almost always illegal. Occasionally there is violence and bloodshed. The Government of India, as the owner of various public sector industries as well as major service industries, is to accept the trade unionism and immediately ratify the ILO Convention on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize, 1948 and the ILO Convention on the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining, 1949. For the first and foremost step to implement all the labour welfare laws as laid down in the ILO Conventions, it has to introduce at once the following changes in the Trade Unions Act: (a) de-linking trade unions from the clutches of politicians by not allowing outsiders to be members of the executive or office bearer of any registered trade union; (b) not to register workers trade unions having less than 15% of the total number of workers of the industry as its members; (c) to make provisions for compulsory recognition of trade unions by the employers; (d) to make provisions for time bound registration of trade unions; (e) to have a consolidated law which would deal with not only trade unions but also unfair labour practices and machinery of settlement of industrial disputes.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말 Ⅱ. 인도 노동조합법의 주요 내용 Ⅲ. 노동조합 설립 및 승인과 관련된 인도 노동조합법의 문제점 Ⅳ. 맺음말 참고문헌 Abstract
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.