Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

의료관련법상의 동의대행(보완)자에 관한 몇 가지 문제점
The Problems of Acting Consenters (or Supplementary Consenters) in Medical Laws

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제26집 제1호 (2010.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.273-293
  • 저자
    송영민
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A117704

원문정보

초록

영어
The concept of acting consenter has been used diversely as guardians, legally acceptable representatives and obligations to protect in medical services, medical laws and precedents. The development of medical technology has been making various medical practices possible, however strict application for principle of explanation and consent should be judged separately as the type of medical practices. Therefore, I suppose it is reasonable to judge the problems of acting consenters(or complementary consenters) as two categories divided into common medical practices and special medical practices.
In common medical practices, the range of acting consenters(or complementary consenter), in principle, would be obligations to support in Civil Law, but it is rational to interpret the range including siblings whether they live together or not. Because they are in the position of realizing their rights of self determination best, and practically it is appropriate to secure medical bills of medical facilities, however, one of legally acceptable representatives would be able to be selected as an acting consenter(or complementary consenter) in case of their nonexistence.
In addition, in the part of the death with dignity as a type of special medical practices, such as judged in separate views of judgement from panel of all judges, the Supreme Court 21 May 2009, Sentence No. 2009 Da 17417, the guardian should get permission from the court about whether the
decision is the best or not to ask the medical team to stop medical treatments for assuring rights of self determination of the person adjudged incompetent through analogical application of the second Clause of Article 947 in Civil Law.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 의료행위상 동의대행자 등에 대한 개념정립의 필요성
  1. 의료행위상 동의대행자 등의 필요성
  2. 의료현장에서의 동의대행자 선정상의 문제점
 Ⅲ. 통상적인 의료행위와 대행자의 범위
  1. 보건의료법 및 판례의 상황
  2. 민법상의 친족 및 가족 개념과의 관계
  3. 통상적인 의료행위상의 동의대행(보완)자 개념의 정립
 Ⅳ. 특수한 의료행위와 대행자의 범위
  1. 의약품임상시험
  2. 정신보건법상의 보호의무자의 보호의무
  3. 존엄사
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

키워드

Legally Acceptable Representative Medical Practice Death with Dignity Right of Self Determination Obligation to Support Acting Consenter Complementary Consenter.

저자

  • 송영민 [ Song, Young-Min | 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 조교수, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제26집 제1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장