Earticle

현재 위치 Home

닥터로우의 『다니엘의 서』: 음모론을 통한 사회비판의 한계
E. L. Doctorow`s The Book of Daniel: A Political Statement of Self-Marginality and Its Limit

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    미국소설학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    미국소설 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제16권 1호 (2009.06)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.27-43
  • 저자
    권지은
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A112776

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
Aiming to criticize the Cold War American society and the notion of American Innocence that it claims, Doctorow heavily invests in The Book of Daniel (1971) on the autonomous and marginalized individual, through which the critical impulse of the book can be articulated. By choosing to marginalize himself from the society that is believed to be conformed to the Cold War logic and thus to reject any possibility of social changes within social boundaries, Daniel aspires to be “a psychic alien,” whose psychological revolt is identified with his desire of political subversion. According to Sacvan Bercovitch, this kind of political dissensus of the individual against the social has become a culturally consented form in the American imagination, and therefore it displays a radical gesture against the society in such a way to affirm American individualism as one of the fundamental ideas sustaining the nation. Then, why is the individual dissensus presented as the only viable form of political criticism in The Book of Daniel? One possible answer can be found in the fact that the text utilizes the structure and political premises of conspiracy theory. In spite of various subjects and ideological intentions, a common denominator in these narratives is the quest for “Americanness”: they commonly ask what American liberal democracy represents, and lament how far the conspiracy- ridden reality strays from the national identity. That is to say, conspiracy theory alarms the nation by envisioning an evil conspiracy at work, yet the alarming also provides a great opportunity to harness national ideals. Against the conspiracy that threatens individual rights and freedom, conspiracy theory resorts to liberal individualism as a way not only to imagine a way of resisting social co-option but also to ameliorate social defects. This essay examines how the individual dissensus espoused in The Book of Daniel actually conforms to the logic and political effect that conspiracy theory produces.

목차

인용문헌
 Abstract

키워드

Conspiracy Theory E. L. Doctorow The Book of Daniel American Individualism American Political Literature Individual Dissensus

저자

  • 권지은 [ Jieun Kwon ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    미국소설학회 [The American Fiction Association of Korea]
  • 설립연도
    1989
  • 분야
    인문학>영어와문학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 마크 트웨인을 중심으로 한 미국 문학 및 문화에 관한 학슬 활동의 증진을 목적으로 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    미국소설 [마크 트웨인 리뷰]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1738-5784
  • 수록기간
    1991~2020
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 843 DDC 813

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 미국소설 제16권 1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장