Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

가족관계등록법에 관한 검토
A Study on the Review of the Family Relation Registration Act

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제25집 제3호 (2009.09)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.81-108
  • 저자
    김기영
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A112090

원문정보

초록

영어
The Civil Law partial Amendment in 2005, of which the main goal is to improve children's welfare and to settle down the bi-sexual equality family system, introduced an accomplishment of bi-sexual equality in family, a reasonable reduction of prohibition range of marriage, a possibility of changing the family name for children's welfare, a national function reinforcement on the matter of bringing-up the children and custody after a divorce, an recognition of custody denial right on the Mother, and a full-adoption system. Those are on the base of world-widely common and general human-right mind and a general value which is granted in human society, unexceptionally carried out as a common tendency among many countries in the world.
Especially the Civil Law Amendment in 2005, repealed `the Head of Family System' from Jan. 1. 2008, and established a new family concept and range, and also ordered a birth of new official identification records which enable to prove and announce publicly the identification relation reasonably without an assumption of `the Head of Family and Family'.
Therefore, the government proclaimed `the Family Relation Registration Act' as a substitutional law of `the Family Register Act', in May 2007 to intercept an important blank of official records which prove and announce publicly the identification relation previously and to prevent the confusion caused, and has carried it out since Jan. 1. 2008.
In the mean time, `the Family Relation Registration Act' which is not on the assumption of `the Head of Family and Family', the purpose of which is a management of registration and attestation of family relation occurrence and change such as a birth, a marriage, and a death of people, would be expected to bring a both-material and immaterial- social value like a constitutional idea accomplishment of a personal dignity and bi-sexual equality, an apparent protection and enforcement of personal identification information, a soundness of local finance, an efficiency of registration affair, a legal security, a convenience promotion of people. They are all possible through the national business of family relation registration affair, a formation of individual family relation registration records and a management by an organization of computerized information management, an issuing various kinds of certificates according to the use and clearness of issuing application standard, a preparation of concrete procedure after `the Civil Law Amendment', an improvement of some imperfections in current `the Family Register Act', a notification of nationality change, and an enforcement of penalty on the person who abuses family relation information .
However, the problems which could be anticipated while `the Family Relation Registration Act' is carried out, which are like a discreet management of delicate personal information such as trans-gender, an usage, application, and watching of registration computerized information materials for a personal life protection, a minimizing social expense caused when issuing various kinds of certificates according to the use, a confusion of succession and change of liability caused when the sexuality can be changed relatively easily, an interception of paternal blood and indiscreet recognition of both parental blood, and a prior interception of 'the marriage an immediate relative' which could be happened during registering a full-adoption, should be discussed more closely and deeply.
After all, `the Family Relation Registration Act' and the problems caused while carrying it out, should be understood in view of a spread of world-widely common and general human right mind and an existence of human right concept, and should be discussed on the premise that we should accept and reflect the value which is generally aimed and recognized in human society to a certain standard.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 가족관계등록법의 제안경위 및 제안이유
  1. 가족관계등록법의 제안경위
  2. 가족관계등록법의 제안이유
 III. 가족관계등록법의 주요내용과 특징
  1. 서
  2. 가족관계등록법의 주요내용
  3. 가족관계등록법의 특징
 IV. 가족관계등록법상의 문제점 
  1. 서
  2. 가족관계등록법상의 등록기준지 
  3. 가족관계등록법성의 가족관계증명서 
  4. 가족관계등록법상의 기본증명서
  5. 가족관계등록법상의 혼인관계증명서
  6. 가족관계등록법상의 친양자입양관계증명서
  7. 소결
 V. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

Family Relation Registration Act Family Register Act(Hojuk-Bub) Head of Family Abolishment of the Head of Family System Publicity of Status Registration.

저자

  • 김기영 [ Kim, Gi-Young | 수원대학교 법정대학 법학과 부교수, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제25집 제3호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장